2016
DOI: 10.1080/02684527.2016.1231866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political-intelligence elites, Strategic Political Communication and the press: the need for, and utility of, a benchmark of public accountability demands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess accountability, some scholars have supported the use of benchmarks to analyze the relationship between intelligence and social actors, like the media (Bakir, 2017). However, this article supports an analysis in which general principles need to be formulated beyond institutional procedures.…”
Section: Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In order to assess accountability, some scholars have supported the use of benchmarks to analyze the relationship between intelligence and social actors, like the media (Bakir, 2017). However, this article supports an analysis in which general principles need to be formulated beyond institutional procedures.…”
Section: Accountabilitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such studies include oversight by the media, academics, and interest groups. 59 International institutions also have a role to play in terms of the impetus of intelligence accountability. Among institutions that have adopted norms and standards for democratic oversight are UNDP, OSCE, EU, Summit of the Americas, Inter-Parliamentary Union, Assembly of Western European Union, and OECD.…”
Section: More Oversight More Accountability?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intersection forms the basis of Indonesia's legal and political landscape, shaping the country's approach to governance, justice, and societal norms. By delving into the relationship between Pancasila and human rights in Indonesian law, we can gain a deeper understanding of the country's legal framework and its implications for promoting ethical governance and protecting individual freedoms (Bakir, 2016) (Chekole et al, 2021) (Cvetković et al, 2021).One key aspect of this exploration is recognizing Pancasila as a source of ethics for the organizers of simultaneous elections in Indonesia .Pancasila provides a set of principles and values that can enhance the electoral code of ethics system, serving as a reference for organizers and ensuring the conduct of free and fair elections that uphold democratic principles and respect for human rights (Muhtamar & Bachmid, 2022) (Ulum, 2021). The inclusion of Pancasila in the electoral code of ethics system helps to align the electoral process with the fundamental values and ideals enshrined in Indonesia's national ideology .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%