2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-015-9378-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political institutions and government spending behavior: theory and evidence from Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports previous findings, which show that Iran's military and security expenditures significantly respond to shocks in oil revenues or oil prices, while social spending components do not show any significant reactions [14]. The spending behavior of the Iranian government in the wake of sanctions can be linked to the quality of its political institutions [11,13]. Dizaji et al show that sanctions have positive effects on the quality of democratic institutions in the short and medium terms, and trade openness may have a direct and positive impact on the size of its budget.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This supports previous findings, which show that Iran's military and security expenditures significantly respond to shocks in oil revenues or oil prices, while social spending components do not show any significant reactions [14]. The spending behavior of the Iranian government in the wake of sanctions can be linked to the quality of its political institutions [11,13]. Dizaji et al show that sanctions have positive effects on the quality of democratic institutions in the short and medium terms, and trade openness may have a direct and positive impact on the size of its budget.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, this contribution will help to understand the dynamics of the shadow economy in similar economies. Finally, it is an important addition to several recent studies about international sanctions against Iran and already existing studies about its shadow economy [3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The paper is structured as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sims () and Sims, Stock, and Watson () argue against differencing cointegrated variables, instead suggesting the use of a VAR model in levels. We follow other related studies such as Farzanegan and Markwardt (), Farzanegan (), Farzanegan and Raeisian Parvari (), and Dizaji, Farzanegan, and Naghavi (), and apply the unrestricted VAR model in the levels of variables. After all, we are interested in applying tools such as the impulse‐response analysis rather than aiming at interpreting each coefficient of the VAR model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend of government spending has been guided by several key macro agents, including political institutions (Gabrini, 2010;Butkiewicz and Yanikkaya, 2011;Dizaji et al, 2016), tax management (Anderson et al, 1986;Patnaik and Yaji, 2018), government debt and others. Dizaji et al (2016) postulated that democratic institutional aspects have negative attitudes regarding military spending by the government and positive effects regarding educational spending with the development of democratic institutions. The study further argued that an authoritarian government is more likely than a democratic one to increase military spending to safeguard its entrenched interests.…”
Section: Effects Of Government Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%