1992
DOI: 10.1080/00036849200000077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political instability, country risk and probability of default

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
34
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Brewer and Rivoli (1990) include three measures of political instability along with economic variables and find that regime instability, as measured separately by both changes in the head of government and changes in the governing group, are statistically significant variables in explaining the probability of sovereign debt default. Balkan (1992) considers two dimensions of the borrower's political environment, a democracy index and a political instability index, and finds them both statistically significant in explaining default probabilities in a sample of more than 30 countries. He uses a democracy index that measures two components of the political system: participation, which measures the extent to which the executive and legislative branches of government reflect the popular will, and competitiveness, which incorporates the degree of exclusion of political parties from the system and the ability of the largest party to dominate national elections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brewer and Rivoli (1990) include three measures of political instability along with economic variables and find that regime instability, as measured separately by both changes in the head of government and changes in the governing group, are statistically significant variables in explaining the probability of sovereign debt default. Balkan (1992) considers two dimensions of the borrower's political environment, a democracy index and a political instability index, and finds them both statistically significant in explaining default probabilities in a sample of more than 30 countries. He uses a democracy index that measures two components of the political system: participation, which measures the extent to which the executive and legislative branches of government reflect the popular will, and competitiveness, which incorporates the degree of exclusion of political parties from the system and the ability of the largest party to dominate national elections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu dönemde borç krizleri ile birlikte, çeşitli ülke riski analizleri yapılmaya başlamıştır. Bu kapsamda Angeloni/Short (1980) ile Feder/Ross (1982) gibi iktisatçılar ülke riskinin faiz oranı farklılıkları ve banka borçları üzerİndeki etkilerini; Edwards (1984); Brewer/Rivoli (1990) ve Balkan (1992) ise borçlarla ülke riski arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırma konusu yapmışlardır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Therefore, indicator systems should be designed to capture target agent features. For country credit, the existing indicator system mainly encompasses a country's economic, financial, social, cultural, geographic, and political fields including its relationship with other countries (Li et al 2012a;Balkan 1992;Block and Vaaler 2004;Beirne and Fratzscher 2013). For example, Balkan Balkan 1992 proposed a model with two political risk variables (level of democracy and political instability) and some economic variables and showed that the novel model including the political variables generated superior results than the model limited to economic variables.…”
Section: Indicator Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the explanatory variables (or evaluation indexes) play an important role in credit rating prediction and vary across different target agents. For example, country risk includes a country's economic, financial, social, cultural, geographic, and political fields and extends to its relationship with other countries (Li et al 2012a;Balkan 1992;Block and Vaaler 2004;Beirne and Fratzscher 2013). Evaluation indexes for corporate credit can be divided into financial and nonfinancial indicators (Duffee and Zhou 2001;Min and Lee 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%