2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00190.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Influence and Declarations of Bank Insolvency in Japan

Abstract: This paper investigates how politics affects bank supervision by examining determinants of bank failures in Japan during 1999-2002, a period during which bank regulators were called upon to resolve insolvent banks in preparation for the lifting of a blanket deposit guarantee. The empirical results suggest that Japan's bank regulators had tendency to delay declarations of insolvency in prefectures that supported senior politicians of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). This result, which is robust to a h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the short-term horizon of politicians, captured regulators would thus heavily discount the future moral hazard repercussions of today's resolution actions. Empirical evidence supports the bias in resolution decisions if supervisors are subject to political capture Dinc, 2005, Bongini, Claessens andFerri, 2001;Imai, 2009).…”
Section: The Role Of Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the short-term horizon of politicians, captured regulators would thus heavily discount the future moral hazard repercussions of today's resolution actions. Empirical evidence supports the bias in resolution decisions if supervisors are subject to political capture Dinc, 2005, Bongini, Claessens andFerri, 2001;Imai, 2009).…”
Section: The Role Of Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 This literature has analyzed how the official power granted to bank supervisors is determined by countries' political systems (Barth, Caprio and Levine, 2006), how politics influences supervisors' decisions to intervene in problem banks (Brown and Dinç, 2005;Imai, 2009), and how the skills and size of supervisory staffs vary with countries' and other regulators' characteristics (Goodhart, Schoenmaker and Dasgupta, 2002). My paper contributes to this literature by studying examinations, which is the main tool of supervision and perhaps the most understudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, politicians may intervene in the regulatory treatment of failed banks in order to maximize their own utility functions. This regulatory capture view in failed bank treatment is supported by empirical evidence showing bank closures to be less likely before elections (Brown and Dinç, 2005) and regulators delaying closure of insolvent banks located in the constituencies of senior politicians (Imai, 2009). Caprio et al (2010) Kane and Klingebiel (2004), who predict that nancial intermediaries that are treated with accommodating policies will suer from distorted incentives, and engage in gambling for resurrection, eectively externalizing their risk-taking to the taxpayer and, hence, society at large.…”
Section: How Distorted Incentives Around Bank Insolvency Can Harm Thementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Existing research tests the eects on bank behaviour (Caballero et al, 2008;Peek and Rosengren, 2005;Igan and Tamirisa, 2008), regulatory behaviour (Brown and Dinç, 2011;Imai, 2009), and individual clients (Djankov et al, 2005) of insolvent banks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%