2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10797-007-9021-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political fragmentation and projected tax revenues: evidence from Flemish municipalities

Abstract: The level of revenues pocketed by a government during the fiscal year often deviates from that projected by this government in its budget. Despite a flourishing literature on, for example, the technical or procedural determinants of such forecast errors, little is yet known about how political stratagems may affect forecast errors. In the present paper, we analyse whether differences in the level of government fragmentation are useful in explaining local government tax revenue forecast errors —controlling for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
84
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
12
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, fragmentation seems to have a negative non-linear impact on tax revenue forecast errors. Similar results have also been found by Goeminne et al (2008) for Flemish municipalities.…”
Section: Political Distortions In Tax Revenue Forecastssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In total, fragmentation seems to have a negative non-linear impact on tax revenue forecast errors. Similar results have also been found by Goeminne et al (2008) for Flemish municipalities.…”
Section: Political Distortions In Tax Revenue Forecastssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The effect of legislative fragmentation shows the opposite sign as theoretically predicted from Hypothesis 3, although it is in line with our Hypothesis 4 and the existing literature (see Goeminne et al, 2008). A higher level of fragmentation leads to less optimistic or more pessimistic revenue forecasts.…”
Section: Political Distortions In Tax Revenue Forecastssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations