Political events and mood among young physicians: a prospective cohort study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo study the effects of recent political events on mood among young physicians.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingUnited States medical centres.Participants2345 medical interns provided longitudinal mood data as part of the Intern Health Study between 2016 and 2018.Main outcome measuresMean mood score during the week following influential political and non-political events as compared with mean mood during the preceding four week control period.ResultsWe identified nine political events and eight non-political events for analysis. With the start of internship duties in July, the mean decline in mood for interns was −0.30 (95% confidence interval −0.33 to −0.27, t=−17.45, P<0.001). The decline in mood was of similar magnitude following the 2016 presidential election (mean mood change −0.32, 95% confidence interval −0.45 to −0.19, t=−4.73, P<0.001) and subsequent inauguration (mean mood change −0.25, 95% confidence interval −0.37 to −0.12, t=−3.93, P<0.001). Further, compared with men, women reported greater mood declines after both the 2016 election (mean gender difference 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 0.58, t=2.33, P=0.02) and the inauguration (mean gender difference 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.49, t=2.05, P=0.04). Overall, there were statistically significant changes in mood following 66.7% (6/9) of political events assessed. In contrast, none of the non-political events included in the analysis were statistically significantly associated with a change in mood.ConclusionsMacro level factors such as politics may be correlated with the mood of young doctors. This finding signals the need for further evaluation of the consequences of increasing entanglement between politics and medicine moving forward for young physicians and their patients.

Highly public anti-Black violence is associated with poor mental health days for Black Americans

“…We omit the initial incident week in these estimates because number of incidents per week and national interest were not simultaneously modeled, but Model 2c estimates suggest 0.26 additional poor mental health days in the incident week. The temporary nature of population-level effects is consistent with prior research on societal stressors (e.g., terrorist acts, controversial political events), although the identified harmful effects on mental health have spanned periods of weeks to a few months (4,18,31). Integrating measures of the timing of public interest or distress may advance this research on the duration and scale of spillover effects from societal stressors.…”

Mental Health and Social Contact During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

“…Of those studies, there are only a handful to date that used daily diary or ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methods (e.g., via smartphones) to assess the impact of stressors on students' daily lives. The few existing studies have focused primarily on U.S. presidential elections and other U.S. events (e.g., the Las Vegas shooting; Frank et al, 2019;Roche & Jacobson, 2019). The idea of tracking participants in daily life is many decades old and was formally introduced by Larson and Csikszentmihalyi (1983) as "a research procedure that consists of asking individuals to provide systematic self-reports at random occasions during the waking hours of a normal week [to obtain] reports about people's experiences as they occur" (p. 41).…”

Brexit and the European National Health Service England Workforce: A Quantitative Analysis of Doctors’ Perceived Professional Impact and Intentions to Leave the United Kingdom

“…Previous research on migration of health workers has showed that in addition to both objective practical considerations, such as availability of public services like schools, cost of living, as well as work place factors such as staffing levels, teaching and professional support, language and ties to host and origin nation are important factors determining migration [ 15 16 ]. Moreover, a recent study highlighted the relationship between Brexit and adverse effects on mood of young doctors connected to political events [ 17 ], which demonstrates the importance of socio-political factors acting as push factors in migration decisions.…”