2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11300-010-0171-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Efficacy of Emerging Elites in Post-Socialist Countries: The Impact of Disciplinary Culture and Political Opportunities

Abstract: Political efficacy, Disciplinary culture, Political opportunity structure, Early life socialization, Socialism, Emerging elites, P2, L3, Z0,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that increasing citizens' knowledge of political corruption can lead them to disengage from politics and decrease turnout (Chong, De La O, Karlan, & Wantchekon, 2015;Stockemer, LaMontagne, & Scruggs, 2013). Individuals are less likely to vote if they believe the regime is corrupt because police erode political efficacy, 4 which affects citizens' capacity for collective action and desire to participate (Dimitrova-Grajzl, Simon, & Fischer, 2010). If citizens believe the security forces are corrupt, they are less likely to view the state as legitimate (Seligson, 2002), as has been shown in Afghanistan (Torabi & Delesgues, 2007).…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that increasing citizens' knowledge of political corruption can lead them to disengage from politics and decrease turnout (Chong, De La O, Karlan, & Wantchekon, 2015;Stockemer, LaMontagne, & Scruggs, 2013). Individuals are less likely to vote if they believe the regime is corrupt because police erode political efficacy, 4 which affects citizens' capacity for collective action and desire to participate (Dimitrova-Grajzl, Simon, & Fischer, 2010). If citizens believe the security forces are corrupt, they are less likely to view the state as legitimate (Seligson, 2002), as has been shown in Afghanistan (Torabi & Delesgues, 2007).…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pooling data from both consolidated and transitional democracies, Rose (2004) also concludes that the lack of trust in parties and national governments contributed to lower voter turnout in elections to the European Parliament. When it comes to political efficacy, the connection between beliefs about the meaningfulness of voting and participation is demonstrated in several studies (see Dimitrova‐Grajzl, Simon, and Fischer 2009 for further discussion). Moreover, it is internal efficacy that is shown to exert a stronger positive impact on political behavior.…”
Section: Corruption Political Efficacy and Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transitional democracies are especially susceptible to the corrosive effects of corruption, because citizens who suffer extreme economic hardships feel betrayed by politicians shamelessly stealing from the state. Some people start to "internal efficacy" that is defined as an individual's belief that he/she can understand and can effectively take part in the political process (Dimitrova-Grajzl, Simon, and Fischer 2009;Karp and Banducci 2008). For the purpose of this study, the focus is on internal efficacy, which reflects doubts about citizens' political aptitude.…”
Section: Corruption Political Efficacy and Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Or, as Linek defines it (2016: 53), "a belief in one's ability to understand and participate in politics, and an interest in doing so. " Consequently, internal political efficacy is recognised as an important determinant of political participation (Dimitrova-Grajzl et al, 2010). In this analysis, due to limitations related to the data, we opted not to measure internal political efficacy, but internal political inefficacy.…”
Section: Serbia In Comparative Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%