2006
DOI: 10.3138/topia.15.91
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Economy and Cultural Studies Column: Political Economy, Cultural Studies and Postmodernism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the postwar rise of the theory of political economy of communication, while rightly critical of media power, and pioneering in tracking the increasingly global transformations of media companies along with the gradual capture of the state by corporate power, has been persistently vulnerable to charges of technological and economic determinisms because of its equally persistent neglect of social, psychological, and cultural processes (Babe 2009). Empirical audiences—plural, located, reflexive—are easily lost in the abstract nouns of political economy theory (market, civil society, population, public opinion, the digital divide).…”
Section: Lessons From Audience Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the postwar rise of the theory of political economy of communication, while rightly critical of media power, and pioneering in tracking the increasingly global transformations of media companies along with the gradual capture of the state by corporate power, has been persistently vulnerable to charges of technological and economic determinisms because of its equally persistent neglect of social, psychological, and cultural processes (Babe 2009). Empirical audiences—plural, located, reflexive—are easily lost in the abstract nouns of political economy theory (market, civil society, population, public opinion, the digital divide).…”
Section: Lessons From Audience Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2. In this sense, Freitag’s approach – which we can qualify as symbolic materialism – allows us to bridge the increasing gap that has developed between the political economic and cultural studies perspectives in communications studies. See Babe (2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, these books sidestepped the debate between some political economists and cultural studies adherents that took up a considerable amount of the relevant scholarly oxygen in the early 1990s in the US and UK (see Babe 2009). The use of ‘middle-range theory’, an intervention widely referenced in subsequent major works, to study the intersection of industrial and cultural dimensions of media ­– and television specifically – also provided methodological intervention that avoided the quagmire of competing critical approaches to culture and its production (Gray and Lotz, 2019; Havens and Lotz, 2017; Steemers, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%