2014
DOI: 10.1108/s0363-3268(2014)0000030002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political economic limits to the fed’s goal of a common national bank money: The par clearing controversy revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1925, the number of non-par banks (in 42 states) peaked at 3,970, representing 14-15 per cent of all banks in the USA. Many state laws were amended over time, but as recently as 1979, there were 7 non-par banks, all in the state of Louisiana (James and Weiman, 2014). Non-par banking was eventually eliminated by the Monetary Control Act of 1980.…”
Section: Par Clearance and Litigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1925, the number of non-par banks (in 42 states) peaked at 3,970, representing 14-15 per cent of all banks in the USA. Many state laws were amended over time, but as recently as 1979, there were 7 non-par banks, all in the state of Louisiana (James and Weiman, 2014). Non-par banking was eventually eliminated by the Monetary Control Act of 1980.…”
Section: Par Clearance and Litigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mid-1916, the Federal Reserve had introduced fees for check collection, yet volumes rose; suggesting the benefits of par collection would have had to outweigh the fees, as membership was voluntary. James and Weiman (2014) suggest that the USA became a true monetary union only with the elimination on non-par banking in 1980. "True" monetary union involves not just a national currency or a national unit of account, but also a "complete national payment union at par" (James and Weiman, 2014, pp.…”
Section: Did the Federal Reserve Improve Efficiency?mentioning
confidence: 99%