Political ecology, variegated green economies, and the foreclosure of alternative sustainabilities

Abstract

Over the past two decades, political ecologists have provided extensive critiques of the privatization, commodification, and marketization of nature, including of the new forms of accumulation and appropriation that these might facilitate under the more recent guise of green growth and the green economy. These critiques have often demonstrated that such approaches can retain deleterious implications for certain vulnerable populations across the developing world and beyond. With few exceptions, however, political ecologists have paid decidedly less attention to expounding upon alternative initiatives for pursuing both sustainability and socio-environmental justice. Accordingly, the contributions to this Special Section engage the concept of the green economy explicitly as a terrain of struggle, one inevitably conditioned by the variegated forms that actually-existing 'green economy' strategies ultimately take in specific historical and geographical conjunctures. In doing so, they highlight the ways in which there is likewise not one but many potential sustainabilities for pursuing human and non-human well-being in the ostensibly nascent Anthropocene, each of which reflects alternative -and, potentially, more progressive -constellations of social, political, and economic relations. Yet they also foreground diverse efforts to pre-empt or to foreclose upon these alternatives, highlighting an implicit politics of precisely whose conception of sustainability is deemed to be possible or desirable in any given time and place. In exploring such struggles over alternative sustainabilities and the 'ecologies of hope' that they implicitly offer, then, this introduction first reviews the current frontiers of these debates, before illuminating how the contributions to this issue both intersect with and build upon them. Key words: Green economy; political ecology; political economy; alternative sustainabilities RésuméAu cours des deux dernières décennies, les écologistes politiques ont fourni des critiques approfondies sur la privatisation, la marchandisation et la commercialisation de la nature, y compris des nouvelles formes d'accumulation et d'appropriation que cela pourrait faciliter sous l'aspect plus récent de la croissance verte et de l'économie verte. Ces critiques ont souvent démontré que de telles approches peuvent avoir des conséquences délétères pour certaines populations vulnérables à travers le monde en développement et audelà. À quelques exceptions près, cependant, les écologistes politiques ont accordé une attention nettement moins importante à l'élaboration d'autres initiatives visant à promouvoir à la fois la durabilité et la justice socio-environnementale. En conséquence, les contributions à cette Section Spéciale engagent explicitement le concept de l'économie verte comme un terrain de lutte, inévitablement conditionné par les formes variées que prennent les stratégies d'économie verte existantes dans des conjonctures historiques et géographiques 1 Connor Joseph Cavanagh, Prof. Tor Arve Benjaminsen,...

Insurrection for land, sea and dignity: resistance and autonomy against wind energy in Álvaro Obregón, Mexico

“…The implementation of "sustainable", "clean" and "green" development projects is being implemented in nearly the exact same way as other fossil fuel, mineral and timber extraction projects (Brock and Dunlap 2018;Martínez-Alier 2002;Nixon 2011). Political ecology shows us that industrial development-green or otherwise-require large tracts of land, which necessitates the invasion of areas for construction and resource capture that have significant livelihood and ecosystem impacts (Cavanagh and Benjaminsen 2017;Corson et al 2013;Dunlap and Fairhead 2014;Fairhead et al 2012). 62 I watched increases of unmarked trucks with heavily armed military and/or police personnel.…”

“…It also analyses the subsequent low-intensity civil war dynamics within the town between the Community Council (cabildo comunitaria) and Constitutionalists. This research is foregrounded by insights from political ecology (Martínez-Alier 2002;Zografos and Martínez-Alier 2009) and critical agrarian studies (Borras et al 2012;Hall et al 2015), specifically the literature on "green grabbing" (Cavanagh and Benjaminsen 2017;Corson et al 2013;Fairhead et al 2012). Political ecology offers the concept of ecological distribution conflicts that Christos Zografos andJoan Martínez-Alier (2009: 1729) define as "struggles for redressing emerging or existing power inequalities and unequal distribution of costs and benefits resulting from landscape or ecological change" arising from developmental interventions.…”

Gross National Happiness: meaning, measure and degrowth in a living development alternative

“…Degrowth differentiates itself from 'green' growth and the 'green' economy, which fails to break away from discourses and practices centered on economic growth as the goal of development (e.g. carbon trading and credits), and technocentric and reductionist forms of intervention (Cavanagh and Benjaminsen 2017). The contemporary degrowth movement brings together several streams of critical scholarship focusing on wellbeing, bio-economics, anthropology of development, democracy and justice (Demaria et al 2013;Schneider et al 2010).…”

Financialisation in the green economy: Material connections, markets-in-the-making and Foucauldian organising actions

“…The green economy captures a range of economic and environmental interventions that rest on the notion that contemporary environmental and financial crises together present opportunities for growth through targeted investments in "green" projects and activities that will supposedly lead to socio-ecological sustainability (Cavanagh and Benjaminsen, 2017;Lohmann, 2016;McAfee, 2015). Financialisation i , a critical aspect of this emergent economy, is part of a general "shift in the gravity of economic activity from production to finance", driven by the increasing possibility of abstracting financial activities from real commodities (Foster, 2007 p.1).…”