2023
DOI: 10.1177/20578911221148830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political dynasties and democratization: A case study of Taiwan

Abstract: Political families in transitional societies are often seen in the context of corruption, democratic regression, deterioration of socio-economic development, inequality, and deprivation. High levels of dynasticism, however, also exist in advanced democratic societies. Using the example of Taiwan, this article explores the factors behind the evolution of electoral dynasties and how the behavior of hereditary politicians has been conditioned by democratization. More specifically, the article argues that legacy p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies tend to use different terminology to explain political family networks, including political family [6], political dynasty [7][8][9][10], political clan [6,11], politician family networks [12], and family ties [13]. Although they use different terminology, they all refer to the involvement of family networks in politics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies tend to use different terminology to explain political family networks, including political family [6], political dynasty [7][8][9][10], political clan [6,11], politician family networks [12], and family ties [13]. Although they use different terminology, they all refer to the involvement of family networks in politics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political dynasties are of particular concern in countries that adopt a democratic system. This practice is considered to violate democratic values, such as justice for society, providing equal rights to all citizens, freedom of opinion, fair law enforcement, and preventing corruption, collusion and nepotism (Teehankee et al, 2023). The presence of political dynasties can damage the essence of democracy by creating inequality in political participation, hindering the development of an inclusive society, and endangering the integrity of democratic institutions (Aspinall & As'ad, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What accounts for the post-2019 resurrection of political families once again? Using historical institutionalism and sociological institutionalism (defined in Teehankee and Chambers [2023] of this Special Issue), this study argues that legacies of autocracy and a reaction to insecurity led to the construction of a neo-patrimonial web of dynastic, path-dependent relations between patrons and clients designed to protect the dynasty's interests. This path produced dividends for political families who could successfully combine the following tactics: elite decision-making, coercion, ready capital, and close alliances with either powerful politicians or the military, facilitating the ascension and sustaining of provincial political family dynasties across time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%