1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0121(96)00016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political district determination using large-scale network optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…George et al (1997) The procedure proposed in George et al (1997) follows the iterative location/allocation approach pioneered by Hess et al (1965), but with the main difference that a new method for assigning territorial units to districts is adopted. For this step, the authors introduce a minimum cost network flow problem defined on the following network.…”
Section: Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…George et al (1997) The procedure proposed in George et al (1997) follows the iterative location/allocation approach pioneered by Hess et al (1965), but with the main difference that a new method for assigning territorial units to districts is adopted. For this step, the authors introduce a minimum cost network flow problem defined on the following network.…”
Section: Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other three versions also costs associated to center-sink pairs are introduced. They are functions of the flow passing through the corresponding arc and consist of penalties graduated according to the actual deviation of the district population from the target value (for details about the cost functions, (see, George et al (1997), p. 20, Table 1). The proposed iterative procedure alternates the location of the centers of the k districts with the allocation of the population of the units to such districts via the solution of the above minimum cost network flow problem.…”
Section: Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 George et al (1997) incorporated modifications to Hess et al (1965) and presented three new versions of the model. The first one incorporated nonlinear penalty functions for deviations from the target regional population, in such a way that the bigger the deviation from the desired regional population, the bigger the penalty.…”
Section: Regionalization Via Maximization Of Regional Compactnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They tend to result from explicit needs of institutions that have to manage territorial dispersed activities, providing a management perspective on zone design. Examples of this are the problem of electoral districting (Horn 1995;George et al 1997;Mehrotra et al 1998;Macmillan and Pierce 1994), sales territories (Leischmann and Paraschis 1998), police reporting areas (Sarac et al 1999), and census output Areas (Martin 1997;Martin 1998). Uniform and nodal regions can be viewed as having a fairly exploratory nature, as they usually assist research and discovery processes.…”
Section: Discovery and Exploration Through Zone Designmentioning
confidence: 99%