2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political discussion and debate in narrative time: the Florentine Consulte e Pratiche, 1376–1378

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that our ultimate goal is to identify mental and conceptual associations which are on average most typical for suicide notes. Hence, we do not take a sociological perspective focused on evolution of collective narrative strategies in connection with other social processes 30 , 31 . Instead, we aim at identifying cognitive patterns which are common across different individuals who committed suicide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that our ultimate goal is to identify mental and conceptual associations which are on average most typical for suicide notes. Hence, we do not take a sociological perspective focused on evolution of collective narrative strategies in connection with other social processes 30 , 31 . Instead, we aim at identifying cognitive patterns which are common across different individuals who committed suicide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning of a word is a fundamental object of study in computational linguistics, where researchers have in particular focused on the disambiguation and identification of lexical semantic change (e.g., Schlechtweg, Hätty, et al 2019;Tahmasebi, Borin, and Jatowt 2019) and word senses (e.g., Amrami and Goldberg 2019;Başkaya et al 2013;Daille et al 2016). Similarly, changes in meaning structures have been examined in the field of computational sociology (e.g., Kozlowski, Taddy, and Evans 2020;Linzhuo, Lingfei, and James 2020;Padgett et al 2020;Rule, Cointet, and Bearman 2015;Schoots et al 2020), although these latter studies are not based on deep language models and therefore do not take context or polysemy into account.…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is concerning, however, is that this conversation is not focused on understanding and then practicing religion but on current social, political, and economic issues. Whatever the topic and style of debate, when it comes to religion, it will be a contentious and aggressive discussion (Padgett et al, 2020). Since religious disputes usually lead to violence, intolerance, antagonism, distrust, war, and genocide between nations, it is clear that religion will always be a frightening thing (Nirenberg, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%