2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political correctness and the alt-right: The development of extreme political attitudes

Abstract: Recent studies have documented a shift from moderate political attitudes to more extreme attitudes at the ends of the political spectrum. This can be seen in Political Correctness (PC) on the left, and white identitarian (WI) attitudes on the 'Alt-Right' (AR). While highly covered in mainstream media, limited academic research has investigated their possible antecedents and psychological correlates. The current study investigated the prevalence and psychological predictors of these attitudes. Utilising a quota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While using symbols and labels, by construction, seeks to influence the societal perception of targeted organizations (see above), veering towards extremes will incidentally, but unavoidably, promote a destructive social climate. Our analysis thereby links to a large literature on the relation between moral absolutism-defined as the "tendency to engage in rigid, 'black-and-white' moral thinking in terms of others' behavior" (Moss & O'Connor, 2020, p. 7)-and support for extreme interventions such as violence or castigating opponents as morally decrepit (e.g., Giner-Sorolla et al, 2011;Moss & O'Connor, 2020). From a business ethics perspective, this connection raises important questions on whether-and, if so, when-it can be acceptable to take on extreme inclusionary/exclusionary stances (Bayer, 2008;Pozner, 2008;Warren, 2007).…”
Section: Labelling Contest: Moral Panic and Moral Patronagementioning
confidence: 70%
“…While using symbols and labels, by construction, seeks to influence the societal perception of targeted organizations (see above), veering towards extremes will incidentally, but unavoidably, promote a destructive social climate. Our analysis thereby links to a large literature on the relation between moral absolutism-defined as the "tendency to engage in rigid, 'black-and-white' moral thinking in terms of others' behavior" (Moss & O'Connor, 2020, p. 7)-and support for extreme interventions such as violence or castigating opponents as morally decrepit (e.g., Giner-Sorolla et al, 2011;Moss & O'Connor, 2020). From a business ethics perspective, this connection raises important questions on whether-and, if so, when-it can be acceptable to take on extreme inclusionary/exclusionary stances (Bayer, 2008;Pozner, 2008;Warren, 2007).…”
Section: Labelling Contest: Moral Panic and Moral Patronagementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Using a simple decision-making battery programmed in accordance with the trade-off framework, traits as diverse as political affiliation, communication skills, gender identity, spirituality, and social preferences-traits that serve as real-world manifestations of personality differences across individuals-were all predicted at levels statistically significant at p-values less than .00001. To the knowledge of the author, the machine-learning-generated linear regressions between the features of the FFM trade-off framework and self-reported attitudes and beliefs are state-of-the-art; despite performing a fairly exhaustive literature review, no existing research could be found that claimed to uncover correlations between personality and political, social, professional, academic, and personal attitudes that approach the magnitude of those described in the linear regression experiments in Table 4 (e.g., Rosenfeld, 2018;Forrester and Tashchian, 2010;Chirumbolo and Leone, 2010;Lowicki, 2019;Erceg et al, 2018;Birkeland and Buch, 2015;Sutin et al, 2012;Moss and O'Connor, 2020). By simply inputting a numerical representation of an individual's hierarchy of motivations into the machine learning models generated by this research, the correct half of each of the attitudinal spectra upon which the individual self-identified (e.g., more liberal, or more conservative?)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is possible that MA and NFC were not as highly correlated as expected. Other scholars have suggested that MA is related to prejudice and political attitudes (Forsberg et al, 2019;Lauriola et al, 2016;Moss & O'Connor, 2020), therefore, we expect it to be explored in the future and that its validity will be tested with other scales.…”
Section: Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 98%