2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political connections and the cost of debt: Re-examining the evidence from Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher the TMT network centrality, the higher the chance that a firm has political ties. Political ties provide access to preferential credit (Boubakri, Guedhami, Mishra, & Saffar, 2012;Chen, Wang, & Lin, 2014;Tee, 2018;Zhang, 2015). Charumilind, Kali, and Wiwattanakantang (2006) documented that firms with political connections enjoy longer maturity and fewer mortgages on credit than other firms.…”
Section: The Mediating Effects Of the Resource Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher the TMT network centrality, the higher the chance that a firm has political ties. Political ties provide access to preferential credit (Boubakri, Guedhami, Mishra, & Saffar, 2012;Chen, Wang, & Lin, 2014;Tee, 2018;Zhang, 2015). Charumilind, Kali, and Wiwattanakantang (2006) documented that firms with political connections enjoy longer maturity and fewer mortgages on credit than other firms.…”
Section: The Mediating Effects Of the Resource Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charumilind, Kali, and Wiwattanakantang () documented that firms with political connections enjoy longer maturity and fewer mortgages on credit than other firms. Similarly, Tee () stated that firms with political connections are linked to a lower debt cost in Malaysia. Based on this evidence, we expected that high TMT network centrality would enhance the chance of having political ties, which, in turn, reduces bond yield spreads.…”
Section: Additional Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance 12: 65-76 (2019) ISSN 2180-3838 (http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/ AJAG-2019-12-06) In this study, we focus on the investors' perceived risk measured by COE, which is directly related to the perception of capital market players and is sensitive to changes in the firm's riskiness. While most previous literature focus on impact on firm's valuation (e.g., Faccio 2006;Faccio & Mura 2016;Fisman 2001;Goldman et al 2009;Guerra et al 2015;Hillier & Loncan 2019) and cost of capital (e.g., Al-Hadi et al 2017;Bliss & Gul 2012a;Jaffar et al 2012;Houston et al 2014;Tee 2018), fewer studies examine the impact of political connection on investors' perceived risk Pham 2019). The present study seeks to answer the following questions: (1) Is there a relationship between political connection and investors' perceived risk?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, due to the effects of systematic exchange of favours between firms and political directors, political influence may encourage rent-seeking activities that divert firm's resources and enable politicians to achieve political and social objectives (grabbing-hand effect) (Boateng et al 2019). As such, investors could also perceive investments in PCON firms as risky, and thus increases the systematic risk of financing costs (e.g., Al-Hadi et al 2017;Bliss & Gul 2012b;Houston et al 2014;Pham 2019;Tee 2018). This paradoxical nature of the impact of political influence in business decisions is worth reconsidering by looking at the types of political connections (directorship or ownership), which may have different impacts on the benefits obtained by PCON firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation