2016
DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2016.08.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Connection, Board Characteristics and Firm Performance in Nigeria

Abstract: This study examines the relationship between political connection, board characteristics and firm performance in Nigerian quoted firms. The model of the study is built based on the agency theory. It utilises a cross-sectional data of 116 firms for the year 2013, obtained from the annual reports of the firms. The robust corrected standard error regression was used in estimating the model. The study provides partial support for the proposition of the agency theory. The study finds board gender positively related… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Chinese firms, having political connections can harm firm performance (Liu et al , 2013), which implies that maintaining relationships with government officials requires significant financial resources and thus limit firms’ ability to engage in innovative activities. Osazuwa et al (2016) also showed a negative relationship between political affiliation and firm performance on Nigerian firms. Similarly, Chancharat et al (2019) viewed political connections as a business risk that leads to corruption and affects company operations, resulting in poor performance among a sample of nonfinancial listed companies in Thailand.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Chinese firms, having political connections can harm firm performance (Liu et al , 2013), which implies that maintaining relationships with government officials requires significant financial resources and thus limit firms’ ability to engage in innovative activities. Osazuwa et al (2016) also showed a negative relationship between political affiliation and firm performance on Nigerian firms. Similarly, Chancharat et al (2019) viewed political connections as a business risk that leads to corruption and affects company operations, resulting in poor performance among a sample of nonfinancial listed companies in Thailand.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In 1971, they joined the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), and in 1977, they founded the National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), which became a key player in the upstream and downstream sectors under the sole authority of a state-owned enterprise. According to Osazuwa (2016), the activities of CPCs in Nigeria have a great impact on company performance, particularly in terms of national economic development and other benefits, which indirectly serve as a wake-up call to other non-politically connected firms. Many research has now found the participation of CPCs, and it has become an in-thing practise for industry that desire to benefit from the connections.…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perusahaan menjadi lebih mudah jika ada anggota partai politik di perusahaan mereka yang juga menjadi pejabat di pemerintahan dimana pada akhirnya dapat memberikan pengaruh dalam pengambilan keputusan dan membawa perubahan pada perusahaan untuk melakukan investasi terhadap peningkatan produktivitas (Najaf & Najaf, 2021). Dalam studi Saeed et al, (2016), Osazuwa, (2016 dan Chancharat et al, (2019) mengutarakan bahwa hubungan politik mempunyai korelasi negatif atas kinerja perusahaan. Namun dalam penelitian Huimin et al, (2014) menemukan bahwa hubungan politik tidak memiliki hubungan yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan.…”
Section: Hubungan Politik Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaanunclassified