Political Cleavages and Social Inequalities 2021
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv209xnfn.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political Conflict, Social Inequality, and Electoral Cleavages in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland, 1990–2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no survey evidence on voter preferences for debt relief. However, it is likely that some Hungarian voters without FC debt, including those who borrowed in domestic currency, would have opposed debt relief and believed that FC debtors should not be bailed out for taking on exchange rate 37 This logic is also supported by the Polish example where the communist party transitioned into the social-democratic party (Lindner et al (2020)), and during the crisis, the right-wing offered bailout policy for FC debtors (Ahlquist, Copelovitch, and Walter (2020)).…”
Section: B Creditor-debtor Conflictmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is no survey evidence on voter preferences for debt relief. However, it is likely that some Hungarian voters without FC debt, including those who borrowed in domestic currency, would have opposed debt relief and believed that FC debtors should not be bailed out for taking on exchange rate 37 This logic is also supported by the Polish example where the communist party transitioned into the social-democratic party (Lindner et al (2020)), and during the crisis, the right-wing offered bailout policy for FC debtors (Ahlquist, Copelovitch, and Walter (2020)).…”
Section: B Creditor-debtor Conflictmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To establish credibility for its commitment to a market economy, its policies were more conservative and market‐friendly than traditional social‐democratic parties (Lindner et al. (2020)).…”
Section: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 PiS is classified as a populist party according to each major classification scheme of political parties-see, for example, Norris (2020), Rooduijn et al (2019) and Zulianello and Larsen (2021). 3 See Haggard and Kaufman (2021) and Lindner et al (2021) for an in-depth discussion of the recent evolution of Polish political and party systems. 4 See Online Appendix D for a detailed description of the Family 500+ programme.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Haggard and Kaufman (2021) and Lindner et al . (2021) for an in‐depth discussion of the recent evolution of Polish political and party systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%