Political competition when media create candidates’ charisma

Abstract

This paper studies the location decisions of political parties. We propose a game where agents vote according to ideology and valence, and media create candidates’ charisma. The results we obtain show that candidates realize the power of media and therefore, locate themselves at some point between the position of the median voter and that of the media. We further obtain that depending on the media outlets the voters choose to see, the equilibrium location of candidates may differ. Thus, when voters choose among the outlets, candidates may differentiate their platforms. Differently, when voters are exposed to all the outlets, candidates tend more to moderate their ideology, in an attempt to get the favor of all the media. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Character Endorsements and Electoral Competition

“…We interpret this as polarization (albeit in a stochastic sense)-electoral incentives preclude any substantial degree of ideological compromise between the average voter and the media elite. This result is in sharp contrast to some other papers in the literature (Grossman and Helpman 1999;Andina-Díaz 2006).…”

Media Competition and Information Disclosure

“…Hence, if no newspaper investigates, they all divide bn readers evenly; whereas if some do investigate and uncover a lie, those that investigate divide n readers evenly. 2 In this sense, investigating and uncovering news is audience rewarding. 3 Note also that investigating and uncovering news is more profitable, as compared to not investigating, the lower the value of parameter b.…”

The Secret of Political Leaders’ Personal Appeal: (How) Do Personality Traits Matter?

“…However, before Autumn 2012, Algirdas Butkevicius was a 'dark horse' in the Lithuanian political arena. He was quite a blank, indistinct, and hardly visible heir to Algirdas Brazauskas, a former leader of social democrats (also President of Lithuania, 1993Lithuania, -1998Prime Minister, 2001-2006. Survey results support this argument: in comparison to other political leaders under consideration, Algirdas Butkevicius was the one towards whom the largest share of respondents had no opinion at all.…”