Political and Social Reflection of Post-Colonial Kazakhstan in Translations of American Literature (on the basis of the works by Jusupbek Aimautuly and Jack London)

Abstract

This article analyzes historical and political views in the translations of the Kazakh writer Jusupbek Aimautuly from Jack London's works. It was the first time when Jack London who is the representative of American literary was translated into the Kazakh language and this work analyzes its reaction on Kazakh literature. Jusupbek Aimautuly was determined as a wise and skillful writer and a good politician at the beginning of XX century according to his translations. There was investigated Jack London's unknown to him spiritual influence to the Kazakh people by quantitative and qualitative research methods.The translations described sadness, torment and unhappiness of the Kazakh people that was under the invasion policy and genocide of the Soviet Union. It was determined that these translations avoided censorship and tragedy of Kazakh steppe and could find their publicity. It was found out that Aimautuly could represent his thoughts, his purposes and wishes to his nation; he talked about preservation of the nation, importance of unity and power of knowledge through the translation. At the same time, he saved all the rules of translation theory and he showed his skills in order to represent Jack London's prowess to the mind of the Kazakh people.

Cultural aspects of the study of choreographic interpretations of I. Stravinsky's ballet “The Rite of Spring”

“…Significant body movements (body language) are not limited to signal fixation. The most important thing here is understanding body language, which provides opportunities for better self-awareness, and somatic education enriches body language (Chilikina, 2014;Aubakirova, 2015). That is, the questions of stylistics and the meaning of movements were also studied using semiotics.…”

Conflict and ways of individualising mass images in early Kazakh prose

“…There is psychologism as a conscious and definite aesthetic principle. At the same time, it can be viewed as an organic unity of psychologism as an object and as a result of creativity (Aubakirova, 2015;Dautova et al, 2016).…”

The treatment of realia in the translations of Smagul Yelubay’s novel “Ak Boz Uy”

“…The western scholars usually put forward the untranslatability as a main feature of realia. For example, Aixela defines culture-specific items as following: CSIs are items in the source text that are problematic for the translator, either because they do not exist in the target language or because they have different functions and/or connotations for TL readers (Franco Aixelá, 1996;Aubakirova, 2015). The Kazakh and Russian scholars usually pay more attention to the semantic components of realia by relating them to a certain language or culture, giving thematic classifications (Vlakhov & Florin, 1980), differentiating between extralinguistic realia and realia-words (Vinogradov, 2001), and offering translation procedures.…”