2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02686209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political and economic motivations for labor control: A comparison of Ireland, Puerto Rico, and Singapore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As early as in 1962 the government made efforts to establish a body to ensure the coordination of unions and employers. However, the motive was neither to domesticate strong, revolutionary unions nor to ensure a labor-friendly strategy of economic development, but rather to preserve and strengthen Ireland's competitiveness (Suárez 2001). The First National Wage Agreement was reached in 1970, and saw the introduction of considerable government involvement in pay determination in exchange for union involvement in policy discussions.…”
Section: The Demise Of Social Partnership In Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as in 1962 the government made efforts to establish a body to ensure the coordination of unions and employers. However, the motive was neither to domesticate strong, revolutionary unions nor to ensure a labor-friendly strategy of economic development, but rather to preserve and strengthen Ireland's competitiveness (Suárez 2001). The First National Wage Agreement was reached in 1970, and saw the introduction of considerable government involvement in pay determination in exchange for union involvement in policy discussions.…”
Section: The Demise Of Social Partnership In Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%