2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9855-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the CSR Agenda

Abstract: broader goals, corporate social responsibility, market failures, market functioning, multinational enterprises, neo-liberal economics, social contract, stakeholder theory, welfare impact,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In China, the public has traditionally expected state companies such as ZZAC to be CSR providers and there are therefore fewer pressures on private companies to provide such services. But, as Weyzig [54] argues, "in the absence of stakeholder pressures, profitable CSR initiatives generally fall within the role of the private sector". As a less favored customer of Chinese banks, this is a very good strategy for private businesses to survive and they may eventually outperform the state companies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In China, the public has traditionally expected state companies such as ZZAC to be CSR providers and there are therefore fewer pressures on private companies to provide such services. But, as Weyzig [54] argues, "in the absence of stakeholder pressures, profitable CSR initiatives generally fall within the role of the private sector". As a less favored customer of Chinese banks, this is a very good strategy for private businesses to survive and they may eventually outperform the state companies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlighting that, despite the pressure from society for sustainable actions that meet the current market needs, it is the manager's responsibility to maintain the organization within a minimal level of profitability in which the activities are simultaneously sustainable and profitable; otherwise, the firm will be subject to failure [63]. The responsibility to create a sustainable environment within its supply chain and productive methods belongs to the organization, capable of providing the expected profit without harming the outside environment [41].…”
Section: Sustainability Practices-economic Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, companies need to look beyond a business-as-usual approach, and have a basis on concerns about the urgent actions for saving the planet. Business should not limit itself relying on a narrow CSR agenda and searching for regulatory loopholes (Gillespie 2012;Weyzig 2009;Azhar et al 2017). Moreover, rather than asking for additional protection from the state, business could contribute in publicprivate partnerships through providing material resources, managerial authority, and expertise where they excel, according to Abbott (2012).…”
Section: Business Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%