2010
DOI: 10.1021/ac102704z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polished Nanopipets: New Probes for High-Resolution Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Abstract: Nanometer-sized pipets pulled from glass or quartz capillaries have been extensively used as probes for scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) and scanning ion conductance microscopy (SICM). A small separation distance between such a probe and the sample, which is required for high-resolution SECM measurements, may be hard to attain because of considerable roughness of the pipet tip. In this Letter, we report the preparation and characterization of polished nanopipet SECM probes with a much smoother tip ed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A pipette with a radius as small as~8 nm has previously been used in an SECM experiment, and the minimum attainable separation distance was < 1 nm. [20] Similar positioning capabilities can be expected for SICM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A pipette with a radius as small as~8 nm has previously been used in an SECM experiment, and the minimum attainable separation distance was < 1 nm. [20] Similar positioning capabilities can be expected for SICM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The intrinsic size and roughness of quartz nanopipet tips were observable by TEM with higher resolution in this study than by SEM in previous studies, 3,14,16,17 not only because TEM does not need the metal coating of a nanopipet, but also because we optimized the intensity of the electron beam for TEM not to melt or deform the insulating nanotip at high magnification. 18,19,29,34 Moreover, a periodic array of 100 nm-diameter nanopores was imaged in this study in contrast to our previous study of randomly distributed nanopores with various sizes and shapes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The roughness of a borosilicate nanopipet tip was imaged previously by SEM, which required a metal-coated nanopipet with a larger diameter of ~150 nm. 17 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nanopipet-supported ITIES was used as an SECM tip to confirm that the nanoscale interface is flush with the surrounding surface of the pipet tip [35, 37]. A sharp nanopipet with a small RG value of ~1.5 (Figure 2B) can approach very close to a target substrate for obtaining highly quantitative kinetic data and high-resolution images.…”
Section: Electrochemical Measurement Of It At the Nanopipet-suppormentioning
confidence: 99%