2013
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2013-05773-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polish topometric groups

Abstract: Abstract. We define and study the notion of ample metric generics for a Polish topological group, which is a weakening of the notion of ample generics introduced by Kechris and Rosendal in [KR07]. Our work is based on the concept of a Polish topometric group, defined in this article. Using Kechris and Rosendal's work as a guide, we explore consequences of ample metric generics (or, more generally, ample generics for Polish topometric groups). Then we provide examples of Polish groups with ample metric generics… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General topometric spaces (i.e., non compact) were defined and studied further from an abstract point of view in [2], where the formalism is shown to be useful for the analysis of perturbation structures on type spaces. The same idea was also shown to be useful in the context of (very non compact) Polish groups, which may admit "topometric ample generics" even when no purely topological ample generics need exist, see [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General topometric spaces (i.e., non compact) were defined and studied further from an abstract point of view in [2], where the formalism is shown to be useful for the analysis of perturbation structures on type spaces. The same idea was also shown to be useful in the context of (very non compact) Polish groups, which may admit "topometric ample generics" even when no purely topological ample generics need exist, see [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The groups of automorphisms of metric structures can be endowed with many topologies and this is the starting point of the analysis of Ben Yaacov, Berenstein and Melleray [5], who consider two types of topologies: the Polish topologies of pointwise convergence and variants of strong (non separable) topologies. We are, however, primarily interested in separable topologies on these groups.…”
Section: Ample Genericsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group Aut([0, 1], λ) (with the weak topology) is isomorphic to the group of automorphism of the measure algebra and applying Theorem 1.4 to the measure algebra we get a new proof of automatic continuity. After the work of Ben Yaacov, Berenstein and Melleray [5], Tsankov [53] further showed the automatic continuity property for the infinite-dimensional unitary group. Given that the group U (ℓ 2 ) is the automorphism group of the Hilbert space ℓ 2 (or the isometry group of the sphere in ℓ 2 ), we can apply Theorem 1.4 to the Hilbert space and get a new proof of this result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below, for x ∈ G and C ⊆ G we denote by C x the set x −1 Cx. By [3, Lemma 3.6] we can find a mapping a ∈ 2 → h a ∈ G such that if a, b ∈ 2 are distinct then Notice that [3,Theorem 4.7] follows from Theorem 3.6 via a straightforward reduction to the case where the target group is metrisable, giving a more elegant proof than the one appearing there. Conversely, Theorem 3.6 also follows from a combination of Proposition 3.2 with [3,Theorem 4.7].…”
Section: Recall From [3] That a Polishmentioning
confidence: 99%