Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.3386/w24657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy Uncertainty and Innovation: Evidence from IPO Interventions in China

Abstract: provided excellent research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described above, China's securities regulator, the CSRC, is authorised to impose suspensions on new IPOs of indeterminate length, and has done so nine times since 1994 and five times since 2005. The motivation for the suspensions appears to have been concern over market stability, in particular that liquidity might be reduced, market prices depressed, or demand from existing stocks depressed by new IPOs (Tian (2011), Shi et al (2018), Cong and Howell (2019)…”
Section: Ipo Suspensions In China: the Institutional Backdropmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described above, China's securities regulator, the CSRC, is authorised to impose suspensions on new IPOs of indeterminate length, and has done so nine times since 1994 and five times since 2005. The motivation for the suspensions appears to have been concern over market stability, in particular that liquidity might be reduced, market prices depressed, or demand from existing stocks depressed by new IPOs (Tian (2011), Shi et al (2018), Cong and Howell (2019)…”
Section: Ipo Suspensions In China: the Institutional Backdropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the length is quite variable: in the three most recent suspensions of 2008-09, 2012-14, and 2015 that are the focus of this study, the length of the suspensions were 214, 438 and 156 days, respectively. 4 Cong and Howell (2019) demonstrate that the suspensions were costly to firms that had been approved and were in the queue for listing, likely due to increased market uncertainty and lost strategic opportunities.…”
Section: Ipo Suspensions In China: the Institutional Backdropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent literature has mainly focused on the impact of political risk or political uncertainty on the cost of equity, cost of debt or investment at the firm level (e.g. Pástor and Veronesi, 2012, 2013; Bradley et al , 2016; Julio and Yook, 2016; Cong and Howell, 2018; Lam et al , 2018). An et al (2016) and Luo et al (2017) examine the general economic impact of political and policy risk in China, while Gurgul and Lach (2013) find the negative impact of political instability on economic growth.…”
Section: Literature Review On Policy Reversalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (2011) examine the conversion of non-tradable shares into common shares. Cong and Howell (2018) explore the impact of the suspension of IPO applications on those affected firms from 1995 to 2014. We name them as “Stock Market” related reversals.…”
Section: Chinese Financial Market Liberalization Policy Reversalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation