2014
DOI: 10.1177/0267323114530581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy streams and public service media funding reforms in Germany and Finland

Abstract: On 1 January 2013, Germany and Finland made the switch from the traditional broadcasting licence fee tied to television-set ownership to a compulsory excise duty collected from all citizens, households and places of business. This article compares the changes in these countries' public service media funding arrangements on the basis of John Kingdon's 'multiple streams' framework of public policy-making which, to date, has been rather neglected in studies of media policy-making processes. Drawing on the analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In Germany and Finland, for example, the advocates of private media industry objected to the new tax-based funding system of public service media on the grounds that it would threaten the operating conditions of the "independent media sector" and thus decrease genuine diversity and pluralism in the media (Herzog and Karppinen 2014). What counts as genuine diversity and pluralism, of course, is another example of conceptual contestation in media policy (see Karppinen 2013).…”
Section: Conceptual Contestation In European Media Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany and Finland, for example, the advocates of private media industry objected to the new tax-based funding system of public service media on the grounds that it would threaten the operating conditions of the "independent media sector" and thus decrease genuine diversity and pluralism in the media (Herzog and Karppinen 2014). What counts as genuine diversity and pluralism, of course, is another example of conceptual contestation in media policy (see Karppinen 2013).…”
Section: Conceptual Contestation In European Media Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases the funding reform constituted a major media policy issue with significant implications for the relationship between the state, the market, the public service media system and licence-fee contributors. In their study of the policy processes that preceded the decisions, Herzog and Karppinen (2014) compared the reforms on the basis of Kingdon's "multiple streams" framework of public policymaking. Drawing on the analysis of policy documents and interviews with policymakers and other stakeholders involved in the respective processes, the study investigated how the actual reforms materialized, which other possibilities were neglected and why this was the case.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge of a licence fee on the grounds of the ownership of one television set constitutes nowadays an obsolete idea, considering the new consumption ways (Herzog & Karppinen, 2014). The future of the licence fee is being defined by three alternative options (Nissen, 2006): its expansion to all kinds of devices that can be used to access PSM content, as it happened in Sweden; its complete removal, being substituted by direct subsidy (the Netherlands); or its conversion into a special tax applicable to all citizens or household, an option that has been implemented in Germany and Finland.…”
Section: Funding Models Of European Public Service Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%