2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.385741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy Selectivity Foregone: Debt and Donor Behavior in Africa

Abstract: meeting for their comments. They thank François Bourguignon and three referees for their extensive comments, Ying Lin (World Bank) for his excellent work with the data, and Brian Deese for other research help. The article was previously entitled: "Will HIPC Matter? The Debt Game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, once they distinguish between the different types of creditors, they find that in the case of HIPCs multilateral creditors appear more generous than bilateral creditors. Earlier, Birdsall, Claessens, and Diwan (2002) studied the determinants of net transfers for a panel of 37 poor countries (mostly HIPCs), and (continued…)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, once they distinguish between the different types of creditors, they find that in the case of HIPCs multilateral creditors appear more generous than bilateral creditors. Earlier, Birdsall, Claessens, and Diwan (2002) studied the determinants of net transfers for a panel of 37 poor countries (mostly HIPCs), and (continued…)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Such lack of selectivity of both the IMF and the World Bank is confirmed by the results obtained in the case of foreign aid (see, for example, Burnside and Dollar 2000;Birdsall et al 2002;Marchesi and Missale 2004).…”
Section: Why Do Agreements Continue?mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Unfortunately, history produces no evidence that this class of swaps increases net transfers to recipient countries (Birdsall et al 2003;Ndikumana 2004). And there is no clear reason why it would happen now.…”
Section: Impact On Net Transfers and Fiscal Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, a large debt burden has been shown to bring about a breakdown in selectivity of donor interventions as donors provide new money in order to allow the country to stay current on debt service payments, rather than for development purposes. This has been denoted as 'defensive lending' (Birdsall et al 2003). Debt relief that leads to a disappearance of the debt overhang may restore donor selectivity as the need for 'defensive lending' abates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%