2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-009-9084-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy relevant heterogeneity in the value of statistical life: New evidence from panel data quantile regressions

Abstract: Value of statistical life, VSL, Quantile regression, Panel data, Fixed effects, PSID, Fatality risk, CFOI, JEL Classification , C23, I10, J17, J28, K00,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
3
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first paper in the symposium volume, by Kniesner et al (2010) examines the heterogeneity of labor market estimates of VSL, providing insight into the effects of both income and risk levels on VSL. The article introduces a new econometric method to the VSL literature by employing quantile regression estimates of panel wage equations based on recently developed econometric methods that control for individual heterogeneity in the intercept of quantile regressions.…”
Section: Overview Of Conference Papers In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first paper in the symposium volume, by Kniesner et al (2010) examines the heterogeneity of labor market estimates of VSL, providing insight into the effects of both income and risk levels on VSL. The article introduces a new econometric method to the VSL literature by employing quantile regression estimates of panel wage equations based on recently developed econometric methods that control for individual heterogeneity in the intercept of quantile regressions.…”
Section: Overview Of Conference Papers In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Costa and Kahn [2004] estimate an income elasticity for the VSL of about 1.5 and Kniesner et al [2010] estimate income elasticities greater than 1.0 from hedonic labor market analyses, although meta-analyses by Viscusi and Aldy [2003], Mrozek and Taylor [2002], and Liu and Liu [1997] produce income elasticities in the 0.4 and 0.6 range and Cameron and DeShazo [2013] estimate an income elasticity of about 0.7 based on a stated preference survcey. Viscusi [2004] and Leeth and Ruser [2003] estimate larger VSLs for whites than for blacks in the labor market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A much more substantial estimate of the income elasticity is reported in Kniesner et al (2010), who use quantile estimates using the PSID data on worker wages in conjunction with CFOI fatality risk data by industry and age. They estimate a mean income elasticity across the different quantiles of 1.44.…”
Section: Income Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%