2019
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy overview of the multisectoral nutrition planning process: The progress, challenges, and lessons learned from Burkina Faso

Abstract: Summary Introduction Malnutrition is a multifactorial problem, and multisectoral planning is an indispensable tool. The objective of this study was (a) to evaluate the extent to which nutrition is integrated into policies and (b) to describe the process used by the government of Burkina Faso to reform its policy frameworks and multisectoral nutrition planning. Methods This was a qualitative study, and data were collected in two key steps: first, through a policy overview conducted in 2015 and, second, in Novem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…agriculture and education), including fewer resources to support nutrition-related activities and challenges in coordination, planning and decision-making for nutrition. Similarly, Ouedraogo et al . (2020) identified variations in the extent to which nutrition is integrated into different sector policies in Burkina Faso.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…agriculture and education), including fewer resources to support nutrition-related activities and challenges in coordination, planning and decision-making for nutrition. Similarly, Ouedraogo et al . (2020) identified variations in the extent to which nutrition is integrated into different sector policies in Burkina Faso.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Most of the times the monitoring and follow-up processes were done three times a week at regional, zonal, city administration and woreda levels by the main taskforces with some degree of staggering. The approach in this study is in line with the WHO and FMOH guidelines and working directives [41,42,43,44] Limitation observed in the due course of the multisectoral approaches intervention, monitoring and evaluation?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous literature has also indicated the critical role of advocacy and engagement to facilitate resource mobilization, prioritization and implementation (Darnton-Hill et al, 1998;Field, 1987;Lamstein et al, 2016;Ouedraogo et al, 2019;Pomeroy-Stevens et al, 2016). In this review, although the majority of plans did include at least some advocacy-related actions at national and subnational levels to promote implementation, engage stakeholders, or mobilize resources, the level of details varied and were missing completely in nearly a quarter of the plans-indicating this as an area for further strengthening.…”
Section: Stakeholders' Engagement and High-level Political Commitment Processes (Area 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More broadly, although this review cannot comment on the success and impact of the plans reviewed in reducing malnutrition and establishing a robust enabling environment for nutrition, previous literature has suggested an association between the existence of national MSNPs-and other evidence of institutional commitment to nutrition-and nutrition outcomes (Fracassi et al, 2020;Sunguya et al, 2014). For example, after the development of their multisectoral nutrition strategic plan, Burkina Faso continued efforts towards operationalization, which led to the creation of a nutrition budget line and the establishment of a nutrition technical secretariat to lead nutrition implementation (Ouedraogo et al, 2019). In Nepal, their MSNP led to improvements in the coordination, advocacy and sustainable structures for nutrition action (Pomeroy-Stevens et al, 2016).…”
Section: Implications Of This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation