Policy Networks, Federal Arrangements, and the Development of Environmental Regulations: A Comparison of the Canadian and American Agricultural Sectors

Abstract

Both studies of federations and studies of policy networks have sought to produce explanations for observed patterns of policy divergence and designs. However, both have evolved in parallel, insights rarely transferring from one to the other. This article reconciles the two types of studies. More specifically, it provides an understanding of the divergent efforts of the United States and Canada with regard to the adoption of environmental regulations for the agricultural sector, which emphasizes the establishment of policy networks through interactions between past policy decisions and federal arrangements. The American federal structure, when combined with unrelated agricultural policy decisions, shaped policy networks in such a way as to enable the adoption of stringent environmental regulations for agriculture. In contrast, the Canadian federal structure, also in conjunction with past policy decisions, prevented the creation of policy networks capable enough to design similarly stringent agro‐environmental regulations.

Fédéralisme belge et venue shopping : le cas de la téléphonie mobile

“…En ce sens, les Régions elles-mêmes se sont comportées en acteurs stratégiques afin de capter la compétence et accroître leur autonomie. La réorganisation institutionnelle de 2009, permise par une élasticité des règles constitutionnelles (Montpetit, 2002a) et déterminée par l'arène judiciaire, sert l'intérêt de positionnement des entités fédérées dans une structure fédérale en développement. C'est auprès des hautes juridic-tions administratives que se règle le conflit de compétences entre Régions et autorité fédérale.…”

Caught in a Staples Vise: The Political Economy of Canadian Aquaculture

“…Unfortunately, provincial progress towards the use of smarter procedural instruments has been much less evident. As even mature staples industries, such as forestry and mining, have discovered, intelligent public participation is critical, not just to deal with the increasingly complex interactions of different user groups in a crowded resource landscape, but also to obtain that elusive social license or "licence to operate" from environmentally-sensitive post-materialist, and largely urban populations (Yandle 2003;Cook 2002;Gunningham, Kagan, and Thompson 2003;Montpetit 2002). And, as noted above, obtaining social license is even more pressing when the product is food.…”

Practicality, Positionality, and Emancipation: Reflections on Participatory Action Research with a Watershed Partnership

“…My own work experience in the Rolling Pampas, validated by insights provided by the policy network perspective on governance (Winter 1996;Daugbjerg 1998), led me to believe that the imagined "watershed communities" of the CIWM rhetoric did not necessarily reflect the different networks of interdependent actors who, while pursuing their own interests, intersect and collide in agricultural watersheds. Moreover, water management in rural Ontario is carried out within the context of ongoing processes of agricultural and rural change that influence the dynamic interplay among farmers, agribusinesses and society, to redefine the role and shape of North American agriculture (Skogstad 1998;Montpetit 2002;Smithers et al 2004). Water quality in particular has become a highly contested policy arena due to the tragic events in the town of Walkerton, in which seven people died and at least 2,300 became ill in 2000 after drinking municipal water contaminated with E. Coli (O'Connor 2002).…”