Policy-Making 2.0: Unleashing the Power of Big Data for Public Governance

Misuraca, Gianluca; Mureddu, Francesco; Osimo, David

doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_11

Cited by 22 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Pentland () has brought a Big Data approach to bear on many social problems, from health and transportation to enhancing productivity in organizations by improving collaboration. Another issue that has been raised is the use of open data in public governance in particular, and this topic has been described in detail (as with this article, as part of a European project) by Misuraca, Mureddu, and Osimo (). Clarke and Margetts () review Big Data and open data in efforts at government reform around the world but with a particular focus on the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada.…”

Section: Literature Review and Current Debatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Big Data for Policymaking: Great Expectations, but with Limited Progress?

Poel¹,

Meyer²,

Schroeder³

2018

Policy & Internet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While talk of “Big Data” is now prevalent in many sectors, there are still relatively few examples of Big Data being used to shape public policy. This article reports an international study of Big Data for policy initiatives to understand the role played by data‐driven approaches in the policy process. Drawing on evidence (including policy analysis and interviews with stakeholders) from 58 initiatives, we find that some policy areas, notably efforts to improve government transparency, are far more represented than others, such as use of social media data for policy evaluation. We also find Big Data used more often in the policy cycle for foresight and agenda setting, or interim evaluation and monitoring, rather than for policy implementation and ex post evaluation. Many different types of data are used in the policy process, with traditional sources such as government statistics still favored over new and emerging sources. We find that use of Big Data for public policy is therefore at an early stage, with expectations far outstripping the current reality.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Current Debatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Big Data for Policymaking: Great Expectations, but with Limited Progress?

Poel¹,

Meyer²,

Schroeder³

2018

Policy & Internet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…And for cross scale, it is how to implement the elastic data processing across multiple scales according to different requirements of big data processing. Glanluca et al [2] introduced a series of techniques to utilize the data from different domains, and proposed Policy-Making 2.0 for public governance in which crossover big data are utilized for decision-making. Vinayak et al [3] proposed ASTERIX project to tackle the challenges of big data management by focusing on the architecture issues.…”

Section: Technical Framework and Big Challengesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modern Service Industry and Crossover Services: Development and Trends in China

Yin

Deng

et al. 2016

IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern service industry (MSI) is an information and knowledge intensive service industry, relying on information technology and modern management philosophy. The development of MSI is of high significance for promotin g rapid global economy, accelerating social progress, and realizing the general strategy of building an innovation-oriented society and harmonious realm. This paper gives an overview of the worldwide MSI development status, especially introduces the development of MSI in China. Our survey of 62 MSI-related listed firms in China shows that Crossover Service emerges everywhere including their business models, product, and services. Thus, we propose the concept of Crossover Service and introduce its 3C-features (Crossover, Convergence, and Complex), the scientific issues, the technique framework and the challenges. And also, we give a brief introduction of our middleware platform named JTang++, which supports the lifecycle of Crossover Service well.

show abstract

“…This process of discourse conduct and public opinion shaping online has strong policy implications. Höchtl, Parycek, and Schöllhammer () referred to this complex and evolving interplay between policy‐making and public discourse in social media as “e‐policymaking,” in which the public is constantly polled during dynamic policy‐making cycles (Höchtl, Schossböck, Lampoltshammer, & Parycek, ) rather than as a separate step at the end of the policy‐making process (Ferro, Loukis, Charalabidis, & Osella, , Misuraca, Mureddu, & Osimo, ). This would allow for tapping into the dynamic process of reshaping and reframing public mass shooting events in the public sphere and enable it to be modeled.…”

Section: Conclusion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responses to mass shooting events

Croitoru

Kien

Mahabir

et al. 2020

Criminology & Public Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research Summary: Public mass shootings tend to capture the public's attention and receive substantial coverage in both traditional media and online social networks (OSNs) and have become a salient topic in them. Motivated by this, the overarching objective of this paper is to advance our understanding of how the public responds to mass shooting events in such media outlets. Specifically, it aims to examine whether distinct information seeking patterns emerge over time and space, and whether associations between public mass shooting events emerge in online activities and discourse. Towards this objective, we study a sequence of five public mass shooting events that have occurred in the United States between October 2017 and May 2018 across three major dimensions: the public's online information seeking activities, the media coverage, and the discourse that emerges in a prominent OSN. To capture these dimensions, respectively, data was collected and analyzed from Google Trends, LexisNexis, Wikipedia

show abstract

Policy-Making 2.0: Unleashing the Power of Big Data for Public Governance

Cited by 22 publications

References 9 publications

Big Data for Policymaking: Great Expectations, but with Limited Progress?

Big Data for Policymaking: Great Expectations, but with Limited Progress?

Modern Service Industry and Crossover Services: Development and Trends in China

Responses to mass shooting events

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About