1994
DOI: 10.1080/0263514940120104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy into Practice: the effects of practical assessment on the teaching of science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the past 25 years, more and more countries have incorporated school-based assessment into public examinations (King & Brathwaite, 1991;Kellaghan & Greaney, 1992;Buchan & Welford, 1994). In 1978, a school-based assessment component called the Teacher Assessment Scheme (TAS) was introduced for the Hong Kong Advanced Level Chemistry course as an alternative to the traditional external practical examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past 25 years, more and more countries have incorporated school-based assessment into public examinations (King & Brathwaite, 1991;Kellaghan & Greaney, 1992;Buchan & Welford, 1994). In 1978, a school-based assessment component called the Teacher Assessment Scheme (TAS) was introduced for the Hong Kong Advanced Level Chemistry course as an alternative to the traditional external practical examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems led some to argue that the target should be abandoned, and others to counter with affirmation of support for it (Hannon 1994). Teachers also had particular difficulties in conducting their assessments of this work (NFER/Brunel University 1992, Buchan 1993, OFSTED 1993a.…”
Section: Attainment Target 1: Experimental and Investigative Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems led some to argue that the target should be abandoned, and others to counter with affirmation of support for it (Hannon 1994). Teachers also had particular difficulties in conducting their assessments of this work (NFER/Brunel 1992, OFSTED 1993a,b, Buchan 1993 Table 2 for explanation of "Levels." The sub-sections (a), (b) and (c) correspond respectively to points (i), (ii) and (iii) in the extract from the programmes of study quoted in the text.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%