2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2006.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
1
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
97
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Forest certification (Cashore, Auld, & Newsom, 2004) and various carbon credits (Cairns & Lasserre, 2006) and REDD+ (Corbera, Schroeder, & Springate-Baginski, 2011) encourage forest management to provide carbon sequestration and other values such as biodiversity in the forest. Other policies are being considered to harvest forests for CO 2 reductions and FF savings (Cubbage, Harou, & Sills, 2007;Richter et al, 2009). The above issues need to be clarified before policies can be crafted that promote desired goals such as biodiversity protection, CO 2 sequestration, and FF savings (Ruddell et al, 2007 The National Research Council (1976) compared FF savings by using wood alternatives to steel, concrete, brick, and aluminum building materials in the 1970s.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest certification (Cashore, Auld, & Newsom, 2004) and various carbon credits (Cairns & Lasserre, 2006) and REDD+ (Corbera, Schroeder, & Springate-Baginski, 2011) encourage forest management to provide carbon sequestration and other values such as biodiversity in the forest. Other policies are being considered to harvest forests for CO 2 reductions and FF savings (Cubbage, Harou, & Sills, 2007;Richter et al, 2009). The above issues need to be clarified before policies can be crafted that promote desired goals such as biodiversity protection, CO 2 sequestration, and FF savings (Ruddell et al, 2007 The National Research Council (1976) compared FF savings by using wood alternatives to steel, concrete, brick, and aluminum building materials in the 1970s.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is now widely recognized that this scale is the most suitable when considering the sustainability of the relationship between man and the forest and to guarantee the protection of the interests of the general public with regards to the forest itself. Furthermore, the use of such a scale is expected to facilitate linkages between forest planning and other planning tools, which, ever more numerous and often overlapping, influence land use today (Bettelini et al 2000, Cubbage et al 2007, Kant 2003, Schmithüsen 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to understand and analyze the effectiveness of the legal, institutional, and economic framework for forests in the U.S., we drew from theory and research on policy instruments and their analysis (Sterner 2003, Cubbage et al 2007), "smart regulation" (Gunningham et al 1998), forest regulatory "rigor" (Cashore and McDermott 2004), and nonstate governance of sustainable forestry . Rooted in this literature, McGinley (2008) developed a theoretical model for analyzing the forest policy structure and approach of government regulation and non-government forest certification in prospective study countries in Latin America.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%