Policy Instruments for Health Promotion: A Comparison of WHO Policy Guidance for Tobacco, Alcohol, Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

Background: Policy is an important element of influencing individual health-related behaviours associated to major risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) such as smoking, alcohol consumption, unhealthy eating and physical inactivity. However, our understanding of the specific measures recommended in NCD prevention policy-making remains limited. This study analysed recent World Health Organization (WHO) documents to identify common policy instruments suggested for national NCD prevention policy and to assess similarities and differences between policies targeting different health-related behaviours. Methods: Evert Vedung’s typology of policy instruments, which differentiates between regulatory, economic/ fiscal and soft instruments, served as a basis for this analysis. A systematic search on WHO websites was conducted to identify documents relating to tobacco, alcohol, nutrition and physical activity. The staff of the respective units at the WHO Regional Office for Europe conducted an expert validation of these documents. The resulting documents were systematically searched for policy instruments. A word frequency analysis was conducted to estimate the use of individual instruments in the different policy fields, followed by an additional in-depth coding and content analysis by two independent reviewers. Results: Across all health-related behaviours, the following policy instruments were suggested most frequently in WHO guidance documents: laws, regulations, standards, taxes, prices, campaigns, recommendations, partnerships and coordination. The analysis showed that regulatory and economic/fiscal policy instruments are mainly applied in tobacco and alcohol policy, while soft instruments dominate in the fields of nutrition and especially physical activity. Conclusion: The study confirms perceived differences regarding recommended policy instruments in the different policy fields and supports arguments that "harder" instruments still appear to be underutilized in nutrition and physical activity. However, more comprehensive research is needed, especially with respect to actual instrument use and effectiveness in national-level NCD prevention policy.

Prevalence and Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Liberia: Findings from 2019–2020 Demographic and Health Survey

“…Acceptance of IPV and having witnessed parental IPV were individually associated with emotional as well as physical IPV. Identification of these three attributes and their strong associations with IPV reported in other studies using Demographic and Health Surveys data underscore the need for social and behavioral change communication, and policies for alcohol control in Liberia [ 24 ]. The need for more women empowerment and gender equality in Liberia is further underlined by the ‘Women Peace and Security Index’ that tracks 167 countries in the world for “sustainable peace through inclusion, justice, and security for women”; Liberia was ranked 144 in the 2019–2020 report [ 25 ].…”

Lessons for strengthening policymaking for obesity and diet‐related noncommunicable disease prevention: A narrative synthesis of policy literature from the Western Pacific Region

“…102 The highly-regulated approaches taken to promote food safety and for tobacco control serve as a useful precedent around the need for a stronger set of policy tools in order to realize nutrition aspirations. 146…”

“…This is exemplified by Trade policy, which clearly facilitates enforcement of food safety policies but can itself constraint opportunity to enforce measures that preference local healthy foods or reduce consumption of unhealthy options 102 . The highly‐regulated approaches taken to promote food safety and for tobacco control serve as a useful precedent around the need for a stronger set of policy tools in order to realize nutrition aspirations 146 …”

Cross-country collaboration for physical activity promotion: experiences from the European Union Physical Activity Focal Points Network

“…7 , 8 Another example is the WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity 2018–2030, which calls for a 10% relative reduction in the prevalence of insufficient PA. 1 These documents stipulate the use of multiple policy instruments, such as recommendations, regulation and financing mechanisms. 9 One important instrument mentioned throughout these policy documents is coordination and networking between stakeholders. 1 , 8 , 10 This includes the coordination of policymaking among government sectors (e.g.…”