“…The Communication aspect is the main problem found, which is characterized by a very short time that seems forced, differences of views between ministries, the unpreparedness of the promoting agency in preparing the appropriate functional position nomenclature, technical tools that were not prepared and the intent and purpose of the policy that was not comprehensively conveyed to the apparatus, causing concerns about the career development of the apparatus. This is also in line with some previous research by (Amalia, 2023), who mentioned in his research "Policy Implementation Of The Equalization Of Administrative" that while the communication aspect has been ongoing, it has not been optimized, research (D. H. Pratama et al, 2023) suggests that the implementation of policies is still in the process of adaptation and falls short of optimal capacity to support organizational policies of equalization, research conducted by (Nuviandra & Kustanto, 2023) also revealed that aspects of transmission and consistency were communication problems that were not addressed in policy implementation in the Sidoarjo Regency Government, research (Mailensun, 2022) revealed that unclear communication, rather than tiered top-down and bottom-up approaches, caused confusion for civil servants whose positions were equalized in regards to their career development, Similarly, in research (Nalien, 2021), which found a communication dimension characterized by differences in the instructions of the Minister of Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform with the Minister of Home Affairs regarding the equalization of positions. The problems of the communication dimension, which has not worked optimally, so that it affects other dimensions of policy implementation.…”