2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0241-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy impacts on regulating ecosystem services: looking at the implications of 60 years of landscape change on soil erosion prevention in a Mediterranean silvo-pastoral system

Abstract: Abstract:Context Policy decisions form a major driver of land use change, with important implications for socially and environmentally susceptible regions. It is well known that there can be major unintended consequences, especially where policies are not tailored to regionally specific contexts. Objectives In this paper we assess the implications of 60 years of agricultural policies on soil erosion prevention (SEP) by vegetation, an essential regulating ecosystem service in Mediterranean Europe. Objectives In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The planet's population will increase, by 2050, to 10,000 million and at the same time will lose between 150 and 300 million hectares of arable land for food production due to salinization, erosion, and urban intensification [2][3][4][5][6][7]. There is then a tendency for an inverse evolution of these two factors and we may recognize the near future challenge in agriculture: to be able to produce more with fewer resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planet's population will increase, by 2050, to 10,000 million and at the same time will lose between 150 and 300 million hectares of arable land for food production due to salinization, erosion, and urban intensification [2][3][4][5][6][7]. There is then a tendency for an inverse evolution of these two factors and we may recognize the near future challenge in agriculture: to be able to produce more with fewer resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis contributes to this challenge by quantifying cumulative and individual contributions of climatological drivers to ES change, as well as the spatial structure of other nonclimatological drivers. Only a few studies ) combined both types of drivers in their analysis, while most focused exclusively on climate change (Nelson et al 2013, Scholes 2016 or land use change , Schirpke et al 2013, St€ urck et al 2015, Guerra et al 2016b, Martinez-Harms et al 2017. Therefore, our analysis represents a step forward in tackling the challenge of investigating effects of both climatological and non-climatological drivers on ES.…”
Section: Reliability Of the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Guerra et al. ). This determines a gap since identifying the actual impact of change drivers on ES allows evaluating the effect and efficiency of past decisions and can improve decision‐making in landscape planning and conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is reflected in a push towards intensification of the system and a simplification of its complexity, with a focus on beef production as the most important outcome of the system. In effect, this leads to a rapid degradation of the system's capacity to provide sustainable grazing practices [47,48], multi-functionality [49,50], and the related delivery of ecosystem services [51,52], including those related to the cultural values of rural and historical Mediterranean landscapes [53,54].…”
Section: Implications Of the Different Discursive Constructions Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%