2011
DOI: 10.1002/spe.1128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy‐driven customization of cross‐organizational features in distributed service systems

Abstract: SUMMARYIn a cross‐organizational context, software services are provided and consumed by different organizations. Ensuring that the non‐functional requirements of all the involved organizations are satisfied is hard to achieve in such a distributed and heterogeneous environment: the implementation of features, for example, security, is scattered across the services of multiple organizations. In this paper, we present a coordination architecture for flexible and policy‐driven composition of cross‐organizational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model‐driven engineering techniques are used to resolve variability and to generate executable application variants. An alternative approach is to select a subset of application fragments (eg, process fragments or Java code fragments) and merge them to form the application variant. The generative approach can potentially incur a considerable runtime overhead (variant generation time + deployment and compilation time + enactment time) as the variability and size of the composite cloud application increase.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model‐driven engineering techniques are used to resolve variability and to generate executable application variants. An alternative approach is to select a subset of application fragments (eg, process fragments or Java code fragments) and merge them to form the application variant. The generative approach can potentially incur a considerable runtime overhead (variant generation time + deployment and compilation time + enactment time) as the variability and size of the composite cloud application increase.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approaches to customizing multi-tenant applications [9]- [12], [17] also use a model-driven approach. Their capabilities include modeling the variability in requirements and composite applications, generating application variants automatically or semi-automatically for a set of requirement options, and reconfiguring the variants [12], [17], [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As commented in , an m‐signature could be used in the same scenarios as an electronic signature, with the difference that an m‐signature is performed in the mobile device of the user, which is almost always under his or her control, and therefore, it could be used anytime, everywhere. Thus, m‐signatures could be used in e/m‐commerce scenarios, such as payment systems, contract signing protocols, negotiation protocols, identity federation, and mobile voting, in e/m‐government scenarios, and in e/m‐business scenarios.…”
Section: Sipmsign: a Lightweight Session Initiation Protocol‐based Momentioning
confidence: 99%