Policy considerations for the control of alcoholic beverage advertising

Trauth, Denisc M.; Huffman, John L.

doi:10.1080/08838158709386674

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Whether a partial restriction on advertising-as opposed to a ban-can be expected to achieve a significant impact on overall consumption remains even more debatable. Nonetheless, a U.S. federal court upheld a ban on advertising in the state of Mississippi in the 1980s, partly on the grounds that "sufficient reasons existed to believe that advertising and consumption were linked" (Trauth & Huffman, 1987), though it is very doubtful that such an outcome could be obtained today at the federal level.…”

Section: Introduction and Literature Synopsismentioning

confidence: 99%

Alcohol Advertising Policies in the United States: National Promotion and Control initiatives

Giesbrecht¹,

Johnson²,

Anglin³

et al. 2004

Contemporary Drug Problems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes policy developments in alcohol advertising and counter-advertising at the U.S. national level, including federally mandated warning labels on alcoholic beverage containers, the campaign for health warnings on broadcast advertising, the end of the voluntary ban on advertising of distilled spirits on television and radio, and the debate concerning a health-benefits label on wine products. Federal legislative documents and media accounts provided the context for 64 key-informant interviews with persons working for the federal government, the alcohol industry, public health, and research and media organizations. A decline in per capita alcohol consumption in the 1980s and 1990s and concurrent demographic shifts in the U.S. population have given impetus to controversial advertising campaigns and their opposition. The policy case studies show disagreement among key players about the impact of advertising on consumption and problems, need for controls, benefits of regulation and counter-advertising, and need for federal-level legislation.

show abstract

Section: Introduction and Literature Synopsismentioning

confidence: 99%