2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00313.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy competition in the 2002 French legislative and presidential elections

Abstract: The French two-round system of presidential elections forces candidates to choose strategies designed to maximize their votes in two different, potentially conflicting strategic contexts: a first round contest between many candidates, and a second round between (typically) a left-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our expert evaluation scores come from Laver et al (2006), who show not only the positions of French parties on the most salient policy dimensions, but also the relative importance that parties 22 As Boycko et al (1996) note, "One key objective of politicians is employment". attach to each dimension.…”
Section: The Numbers Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our expert evaluation scores come from Laver et al (2006), who show not only the positions of French parties on the most salient policy dimensions, but also the relative importance that parties 22 As Boycko et al (1996) note, "One key objective of politicians is employment". attach to each dimension.…”
Section: The Numbers Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laver et al estimate the policy positions by conducting an expert survey in which they collected the judgements of French political scientists on the policy positions of the French parties. This survey followed the model of expert surveys conducted by Laver and Hunt (1992), and provides a score for each party regarding their "social policy" (for more details, see the Appendix in Laver et al, 2006). This score takes values between 2.5 to 18.9, with higher scores referring to more Right-wing parties.…”
Section: The Numbers Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klemmensen et al, 2007;Kritzinger et al, 2004;Laver et al, 2006), but has also been the subject of vivid scientific discussion Laver, 2007, 2008;Pennings, 2007a, 2007b;Martin and Vanberg, 2008). Pennings (2007a, 2007b) recognize the usefulness of the method, but are particularly concerned about the pairwise comparison (estimating policy positions on the basis of previous texts and findings); they argue that the program flattens out party movement, as previous computerized approaches have done.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rooted in the early literature on party types and party systems (Bondel 1968;Sartori 1976), these recent studies have explored the dynamic between president and presidential party policy in Latin America (Wiesehomeier and Benoit 2009), the policy positions of party groups in the European Union Benoit 2007, 2010), and the mapping of party policy space in Ireland (Benoit and Laver 2005) and France (Laver, Benoit, and Sauger 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%