2002
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47374-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy and Portals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different website assessment models [42,44]. Each of these models offers a solid perspective of how multiple factors influence the performance of a particular area of interest, service, or policy domain [7,10,11,14,43]. This article extends the model of ranking using the evolution perspective of Sandoval Almazan and Gil-García [42].…”
Section: Source: Adapted From Sandoval-almazan and Gil-garcia (2009)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are different website assessment models [42,44]. Each of these models offers a solid perspective of how multiple factors influence the performance of a particular area of interest, service, or policy domain [7,10,11,14,43]. This article extends the model of ranking using the evolution perspective of Sandoval Almazan and Gil-García [42].…”
Section: Source: Adapted From Sandoval-almazan and Gil-garcia (2009)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To make full use of IT, the fast-emerging concept of e-government portals must be better developed and publicised (Fletcher, 2002). One of the benefits of e-government is that it could open up the decision-making process to wider scrutiny.…”
Section: Digital Citizenship and Environmental Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The promises of digital government range from improved service quality to more effective and efficient government programs and policies [11,12,15,21]. However, digital government initiatives also face a great number of challenges from mismatched data structures and technical incompatibility to organizational resistance and unfavorable institutional arrangements [8,10,13,14].…”
Section: Poster Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%