2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policy analysis of perennial energy crop cultivation at the farm level: Short rotation coppice (SRC) in Germany

Abstract: This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library 1 Postprint This is the accepted version of a paper published in Biomass & Bioenergy. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic benefits gained from SRP were found to be of little relevance for farmers of the more profit oriented agricultural business companies. This is supported by literature that economics matter and land owners are unwilling to adopt bioenergy crops unless there is a significant improvement in market outlook and profitability [42]. This was specifically the case for the agricultural business companies, which were more interested in agricultural options that will generate higher income than SRP does (e.g., intensive agricultural practice or less common commodities on the market such as vegetables).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The economic benefits gained from SRP were found to be of little relevance for farmers of the more profit oriented agricultural business companies. This is supported by literature that economics matter and land owners are unwilling to adopt bioenergy crops unless there is a significant improvement in market outlook and profitability [42]. This was specifically the case for the agricultural business companies, which were more interested in agricultural options that will generate higher income than SRP does (e.g., intensive agricultural practice or less common commodities on the market such as vegetables).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Subsidies, e.g., for non-market eco-system services, establishment grants or loans can serve as incentives to increase the willingness of farmers to invest in SRP or bioenergy plants [39]. In a scenario analysis evaluating the performance of a range of policy instruments, an establishment subsidy was found to have the greatest effect on the adoption of SRP and farm income [42]. Moreover, infrastructure and major facilities of utilization are important factors in decision making among farmers [39].…”
Section: Incentives and Barriers Relevant To The Adoption Of Srpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger stem size observed under longer single stem rotation suggests this method can be used as feedstock across different industrial production processes (i.e. packaging, composite wood panel) in addition to energy purposes [71], diversifying the market of wood assortments produced by poplar SRCs [72].…”
Section: Above-ground Biomass Productivity and Implications For Src Management And Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the FGTs which are planted in different regions should be selected properly considering the specific factors of each region, such as type of soil, quantity of rain, etc. The Thai government should consider offering a guaranteed price which can help stimulate immediate short-rotation coppice adoption [39]. Furthermore, importers still request a certificate for good forestry management due to concerns about the raw material being from natural forest or poor cultivation.…”
Section: Encouraging Cultivation Of Fast-growing Trees In Wastelandmentioning
confidence: 99%