Policing victims of partner violence during COVID-19: a qualitative content study on Australian grey literature

Workman, Alex; Kruger, Erin; Dune, Tinashe

doi:10.1080/10439463.2021.1888951

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There was a propensity to compound IPV experiences with sexual violence [ 32 ], which does not consider the definitional nuances of each type of violence. For example, IPV is commonly understood as the control processes that one person uses to demean, devalue, and dehumanise their victim [ 9 ]. In contrast, sexual violence can be used in IPV relationships; however, it may occur outside of relationships where the victim may not necessarily know their perpetrator and is done for humiliation and degradation [ 9 ].…”

Section: Major Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, IPV is commonly understood as the control processes that one person uses to demean, devalue, and dehumanise their victim [ 9 ]. In contrast, sexual violence can be used in IPV relationships; however, it may occur outside of relationships where the victim may not necessarily know their perpetrator and is done for humiliation and degradation [ 9 ]. These slight variances and lack of clarification convolute understandings of these forms of violence, which are often unique from one another and can arise as isolated experiences.…”

Section: Major Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These reports centre on White, cisgender, heterosexual women’s victimised experiences that ultimately shape contemporary societal understandings of violence. Further, many groups remain overlooked, notably the LGBTIQ community [ 3 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Qualitative understandings of victims’ experiences are often missing in the current policy, advocacy, and media reporting from the LGBTIQ perspective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

LGBTIQ CALD People’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Literature Review

Workman

Kruger

Micheal

et al. 2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Experience of surviving intimate partner violence (IPV) is well documented in research, policing practices, newspapers, and awareness campaigns domestically and internationally. Arguably, those who have survived IPV and have their experiences reflected within society undergo a transformative experience of empowerment. As society recognises and validates their experience has occurred, and responds to it, accordingly, as some survivors have targeted services and interventions to assist in this transformation. However, for LGBTIQ-identifying peoples, experiences of IPV are poorly understood in contemporary society, which is further exacerbated for LGBTIQ-identifying CALD people as they continue to remain hidden. Aim and objective: The systematic literature review aims to explore the experiences of this group in their development of resilience following an abusive and violent relationship. Methods: Of the potential 230 identified studies, 5 studies met the eligibility criteria. In line with the eligibility criteria, these studies were first reviewed by title, then by abstract and then by full text. Of those studies which the research team deemed relevant for inclusion, their reference lists where also reviewed to determine if any further relevant studies could be identified using this strategy. As a result of the above process, five (5) studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Results: From data extraction, three major themes emerged: Intimate Partner Violence as Experienced by LGBTIQ survivors, Marginalised Identity and Types of Survivorship. While refined, these themes capture a more robust set of sub-themes that identify the diverse ways in which LGBTIQ survivors experience responses to their victimised status as experienced in IPV situations. Conclusions: Overall, the review found that resilient outcomes for LGBTIQ CALD survivors remain misunderstood and missing within the literature. There is a propensity to focus on negative coping strategies and an exclusive focus on LGBTIQ CALD vulnerabilities. Future research requires investigation into strategies and support that move beyond coping to include resilient outcomes and support systems that allow manifestations of resilience.

show abstract

Section: Major Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Major Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

LGBTIQ CALD People’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Literature Review

Workman

Kruger

Micheal

et al. 2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The first and most prominent theme relates to police enforcement of pandemic-related laws and regulations (such as lockdown restrictions) and public perceptions of and compliance with this enforcement (see Biswas and Sultana 2020 ; Boon-Kuo et al 2021 ; Farrow 2020 ; Grace 2020 ; Jankovic and Cvetkovic 2020 ; Jiang and Xie 2020 ; Jones 2020 ; Ka-Ki Ho et al 2020 ; Luong 2020 ; Perry and Jonathan-Zamir 2020 ; Reicher and Stott 2020 ; Deckert et al 2021 ; McCarthy et al 2021 ; Mazerolle and Ransley 2021 ; Sargeant et al 2021 ; Scalia 2021 ; Terpstra et al 2021 ; Waseem 2021 ). The second theme concerns the police response to more established crimes and vulnerabilities within the context of the pandemic, such as domestic violence (Nix and Richards 2021 ; Walklate et al 2021 ; Workman et al 2021 ), mental health (Lersch 2020 ), cybercrime (Horgan et al 2021 ) and the production, supply and consumption of illicit drugs (Marks et al 2020 ; Trappen and McLean 2021 ). The third theme revolves around police occupational culture and wellbeing during the pandemic (Rooney and McNicholas 2020 ; Stogner et al 2020 ; De Carmargo 2021 ; Fleming and Brown 2021 ; Kypriandes et al 2021 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical workers? Private security, public perceptions and the Covid-19 pandemic

White

2022

Secur J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is among the first to explore the role and status of the private security industry during the Covid-19 pandemic. Focussing on the UK case, it illustrates how even though most private security officers were designated as ‘critical workers’ in this time of crisis, performing a range of functions essential to national infrastructure and law and order, the public have been slow or reluctant to recognise the contribution of the sector. It argues that this disposition is reflective of a longstanding public ambivalence or unease towards the private security industry which can ultimately be traced to the state-centric sociological terrain of the policing field.

show abstract

Machine Learning for Identifying Abusive Content in Text Data

Nayak

Baek

2022

Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Policing victims of partner violence during COVID-19: a qualitative content study on Australian grey literature

Cited by 6 publications

References 46 publications

LGBTIQ CALD People’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Literature Review

LGBTIQ CALD People’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Literature Review

Critical workers? Private security, public perceptions and the Covid-19 pandemic

Machine Learning for Identifying Abusive Content in Text Data

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About