Abstract:This paper reports findings from a London-based study and provides evidence of rigorous law enforcement activity being enacted in drives to alleviate local areas of public drugs nuisance, namely the use of anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) and dispersal and banning orders, as well as the closure of 'crack houses'. The paper acknowledges these legislative tools were necessary to deal with the real life problems of visible drugs nuisance that had grown up in some communities, but it draws attention to the way… Show more
“…As an example of this, Sanders (2005) has described how club security staff often display a 'blind-eye' attitude or are even complicit in the selling and use of drugs (see also Hobbs et al, 2003). Complementing these findings, Ward (2011) argues that, contrary to the hard-line approaches used to target visible hard-end drug users in public spaces in London, recreational drug use hidden within the private domains of bars and nightclubs has generated little public debate and police attention.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While existing research has suggested that the cultural normalization of clubbers' drug use (Duff, 2005) has been coupled with a relative relaxation in the regulation of drug activities inside venues (Sanders, 2005;Ward, 2011), this article challenges such assumptions by arguing for the need for more nuanced understandings of drug policing in nightlife spaces. The article points to a growing governmental intolerance of drugs in Danish nightlife spaces, and analyses how drug-using clubbers are targets of inter-related police and club security banning measures aimed at excluding them from entire nightlife districts.…”
The paper argues that a third-party policing perspective combined with assemblage theory is useful for highlighting how the enforcement of national drug policies and nightlife banning systems is shaped by their embeddedness in local 'drug policing assemblages' characterized by inter-agency relation-building, the creative combination of public and private (legal) resources and internal power struggles. It also provides evidence of how drug policing assemblages give rise to many different, and often surprising, forms of jurisdiction involving divergent performances of spaces-, objects- and authorities of governance.
“…As an example of this, Sanders (2005) has described how club security staff often display a 'blind-eye' attitude or are even complicit in the selling and use of drugs (see also Hobbs et al, 2003). Complementing these findings, Ward (2011) argues that, contrary to the hard-line approaches used to target visible hard-end drug users in public spaces in London, recreational drug use hidden within the private domains of bars and nightclubs has generated little public debate and police attention.…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While existing research has suggested that the cultural normalization of clubbers' drug use (Duff, 2005) has been coupled with a relative relaxation in the regulation of drug activities inside venues (Sanders, 2005;Ward, 2011), this article challenges such assumptions by arguing for the need for more nuanced understandings of drug policing in nightlife spaces. The article points to a growing governmental intolerance of drugs in Danish nightlife spaces, and analyses how drug-using clubbers are targets of inter-related police and club security banning measures aimed at excluding them from entire nightlife districts.…”
The paper argues that a third-party policing perspective combined with assemblage theory is useful for highlighting how the enforcement of national drug policies and nightlife banning systems is shaped by their embeddedness in local 'drug policing assemblages' characterized by inter-agency relation-building, the creative combination of public and private (legal) resources and internal power struggles. It also provides evidence of how drug policing assemblages give rise to many different, and often surprising, forms of jurisdiction involving divergent performances of spaces-, objects- and authorities of governance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.