2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9030473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Policies for Reintegrating Crop and Livestock Systems: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract: Abstract:The reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrated systems can also increase profits for farmers through reduced costs (e.g. Bell & Moore 2012), labor (Neto et al 2014), or increased productivity compared with specialized systems (Oliveira et al 2013), but these outcomes are highly dependent on the region and systems implemented and the broader policy and market context (Garrett et al 2017a). Each type of integrated system confers different benefits depending on the types of crops and livestock being used and the level of integration (Moore et al 2016).…”
Section: Integrated Crop and Livestock Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Integrated systems can also increase profits for farmers through reduced costs (e.g. Bell & Moore 2012), labor (Neto et al 2014), or increased productivity compared with specialized systems (Oliveira et al 2013), but these outcomes are highly dependent on the region and systems implemented and the broader policy and market context (Garrett et al 2017a). Each type of integrated system confers different benefits depending on the types of crops and livestock being used and the level of integration (Moore et al 2016).…”
Section: Integrated Crop and Livestock Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While seasonal integration during the dormant season is common in New Zealand, this practice is less documented elsewhere, offering a unique opportunity to better understand the potential benefits and challenges associated with this practice for other regions. The choice of New Zealand is also a particularly useful place to examine farmer perceptions of ICLS since there are fewer policy barriers to their adoption, as compared to other regions (Garrett et al 2017a (Marlborough District Council 2008). This significant land use change has resulted in many potential impacts for the region including an increase in irrigation (Niles and Mueller 2016), and a significant increase in herbicide use in viticulture during the 1990s (Dastgheib and Frampton 2000), with estimates that 70% of Marlborough vineyards applied herbicides by 2007 (SHANZ 2011).…”
Section: Study Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work suggests that crop-pasture rotation systems may have higher profitability than continuous grain and cattle production by themselves as the improved pasture enables higher stocking rates [40]. Currently adoption rates remain low due to initial investment, knowledge, and cultural barriers; in 2011, integrated crop-livestock systems were only being used on 1% (1.5 Mha) of pastures in Brazil [42][43][44]. Still, if the documented obstacles to ICLS adoption can be bridged by government programs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, if the documented obstacles to ICLS adoption can be bridged by government programs (e.g. the ABC plan), research incentives, or the agricultural credit created by the National Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest Systems Policy (Law 12805, 29 April 2013), a diverse range of agricultural, environmental, and economic benefits could be leveraged [42,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Japan, Netherland) to support animal production at high livestock densities. However, the global trade of feed has contributed also to P surpluses in importing countries, and to soil P depletion and/or reliance on fertilizer P import in exporting countries (Schipanski and Bennett 2012;Garrett et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%