Policies for reducing agricultural sector vulnerability to climate change in Mali

Abstract

The Mali agricultural sector and the country's food security are potentially vulnerable to climate change. Policies may be able to mitigate some of the climate change vulnerability. This article investigates several policy changes that may reduce vulnerability, including climate-specific and other policies. The policy set includes migration of cropping patterns, development of high-temperature-resistant cultivars, reduction in soil productivity loss, cropland expansion, adoption of improved cultivars, and changes in trade patterns. When all policies are considered together, results under climate change show an annual gain of $252 million in economic benefits as opposed to a $161 million loss without policy adjustment. Simultaneously, undernourishment is reduced to 17% of the Malian population as compared with 64% without policy adjustment. We also find tradeoffs in cases between economic benefits and undernourishment. Policies are also studied individually and collectively. Overall, the results indicate that policy can play an important role in reducing climate change vulnerability in Mali.

Socio-economic vulnerability to climate change in the central mountainous region of eastern Mexico

“…Maintaining biological diversity is essential for productive agriculture, and ecologically sustainable agriculture is in turn essential for maintaining biological diversity (Pimentel et al 1992). In places where the new conditions are not favorable for coffee and the payment of environmental services is not suitable, some suggestions could be to change to other crops that maintain forest cover and diversity, diversify the agricultural areas implementing more crops, or change the cropping pattern in warm regions shifting toward patterns used in hotter regions (Butt et al 2006). These suggestions might help mitigate the impacts of climate change.…”

Climate Change, Society, and Agriculture: An Economic and Policy Perspective

“…• Adaptation can alter income effects substantially and reduce the risk of hunger effects (Butt et al, 2005(Butt et al, , 2006Reilly et al, 2002).…”

A critical review of impact of and adaptation to climate change in developed and developing economies

“…This range of options, however, constitutes only temporary coping measures. For many countries located in tropical regions, the potential benefits of such low-cost adaptation measures as changes in planting dates, crop mixes, and cultivars do not turn out to be sufficient to offset the significant climate change damages (Rosenzweig and Parry 1994;Butt et al 2006). Options that enhance long-term adaptive capacity (such as institutional credit, crop insurance, and use of drought-resistant varieties) are not used by farmers due to procedural complexities and stringent eligibility criteria, compounded by lack of awareness (Bhadwal et al 2003).…”