2008
DOI: 10.1080/10439460802091690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Police use of force and neighbourhood characteristics: an examination of structural disadvantage, crime, and resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This measure, proportion of aggressive resistance incidents , offers a way to control for one of the strongest situational predictors of force behavior, and it allows us to capture important differences among workgroups in their exposure to aggressive resistance. It is also consistent with the experiences of other researchers who have had similar data issues and have incorporated proportional resistance measures to examine force at the neighborhood level (Lersch et al., ).…”
Section: Police Culture and Officers’ Organizational Environmentssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This measure, proportion of aggressive resistance incidents , offers a way to control for one of the strongest situational predictors of force behavior, and it allows us to capture important differences among workgroups in their exposure to aggressive resistance. It is also consistent with the experiences of other researchers who have had similar data issues and have incorporated proportional resistance measures to examine force at the neighborhood level (Lersch et al., ).…”
Section: Police Culture and Officers’ Organizational Environmentssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For this example, the primary dependent variable represents the number of times an officer resorted to using a "high" level of force (i.e., any time an officer reported using hard-hand force, chemical spray, CEDs, or other impact weapons as the highest level of force) during citizen encounters. The variable is a count of the frequency in which officers use such force and is similar to the results of prior research examining the relationship between higher levels of force and neighborhood characteristics (Lersch et al, 2008), as well as that examining situational-and officer-based predictors (Terrill and Mastrofski, 2002).…”
Section: Force Data and Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 91%
“…A core police role has long been considered judicious but not undue use of psychological and physical force to maintain order 4 51–54. Police also are trained to survive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the very leastand methodologically speakingthe two different tracking policies (Sherman 2013) create a comparability issue between forces. The disparities illustrate the implications on police accountability and particularly around the transparency and the reporting of use of force, which continuous to be a contentious area in policing (Lersch et al 2008;Pate et al 1993;Terrill 2001;Garner et al 2006;Wolf et al 2009). This problem is exacerbated when many forces, including Officers are instructed to record the detail of any incident, force used and the rationale supporting the application based on the NDM in their pocket notebooks.…”
Section: Missing Gaps In the Literature On Bwcsmentioning
confidence: 99%