Police trust-building strategies. A socio-institutional, comparative approach

Abstract

Police require public trust to do their work well. Recognising this, police organisations across Europe implement various methods to gain trust: trust-building strategies. Surprisingly, the field of trust in the police and police legitimacy has paid scant attention to what the police actually do to improve trust. The present contribution outlines an approach to understanding police trust-building strategies in their social and institutional context applying a comparative, dynamic perspective. Departing from the assumption that trust and legitimacy exist in a dialogue between the public and the police, the author argues that trustbuilding strategies develop in an unpredictable, dynamic complex of interrelated social and institutional factors. What is seen as a suitable trust-building strategy is determined by dominant 'rationalised myths', ways of thinking about what good police work should look like. These are shaped by a diverse range of different actors and factors. This complex affects each phase in the development of police trust-building strategies: problem recognition, generation of strategies, and adoption of strategies. Illustrating the value of the socio-institutional approach towards trustbuilding strategies, each of these phases is discussed in the context of a comparative, dynamic study of police trust-building strategies in England and Wales, Denmark, and the Netherlands. It is argued that this more sophisticated understanding of trust-building in its social and institutional context does not just tell us something about the police, but also helps us understand how state institutions shape and maintain their position in the complex environments of our changing societies.

CSR Disclosure: Effects of Political Ties, Executive Turnover and Shareholder Equity. Evidence from China

“…It instills a kind of informality in business state relationships by envisaging the base of state-business relations on shared goals [55] resulting in trust building between state and business. This trust and knowledge may lead to the exchange of favors with bureaucrats and incline them to lightening the regulatory load on firms, relaxation in tax and other fees, and easing in the provision of resources controlled by the state in the form of loans and land use rights [56,57]. Therefore, the political ties of a firm can support them to reduce the uncertainty of survival while extending companies with enormous assistance.…”

Results and perspectives on policing as part of the national security sector

“…Recognizing this, police organizations in Europe have begun to emphasize this, but do not pay attention to what the police are really doing to increase public confidence. However, according to D. Schaap, trust is the result of a dialogue between the public and the police, and trust-building strategies are developing in an unpredictable, dynamic set of interrelated social and institutional factors (Schaap, 2021). This is also confirmed by the fact that, according to M.P.J.…”

Rethinking police procedural justice

“…In practice, in many societies, there are at least substantial minorities contesting this view of the state, policing and societal order, for instance due to over-policing or because the police are not seen to protect their group (Fassin, 2013). That police resources and attention are unequally distributed across society is well known, their activities being especially focused on groups sometimes labeled ‘police property’ (Lee, 1981): the poor, youth, migrants, ethnic minorities and other suspected and labeled communities (see Aliverti, 2020; MacCoun, 2005; Schclarek Mulinari and Keskinen, 2020; Solhjell et al, 2019). These groups and communities are often well aware of police scrutiny, which contributes to poor police–public relationships (Engel, 2005; Lee, 1981).…”