1996
DOI: 10.1080/09585189608415014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Police interviewing and the use of appropriate adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a discussion of the provision of appropriate adults exclusively for young suspects is justi ed because local authorities have a statutory duty to provide appropriate adults only for young suspects. Moreover, it has been suggested that future Codes should distinguish between the needs and requirements of young and mentally disordered adult detainees (Robertson et al, 1996). The needs of young people are likely to be different to those of mentally disordered people.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a discussion of the provision of appropriate adults exclusively for young suspects is justi ed because local authorities have a statutory duty to provide appropriate adults only for young suspects. Moreover, it has been suggested that future Codes should distinguish between the needs and requirements of young and mentally disordered adult detainees (Robertson et al, 1996). The needs of young people are likely to be different to those of mentally disordered people.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exclusive focus on appropriate adults for young persons is justified because local authorities (in co-operation with other local agencies) only have a statutory duty to provide appropriate adults for young suspects (CDA, s. 38(4)(a) ). Moreover, it has been suggested that future Codes should distinguish between the needs and requirements of young and mentally disordered adult detainees (Robertson et al 1996). The needs of young people are likely to be different to those of people with learning difficulties.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its inception, there has been a burgeoning literature concerning the efficacy of the AA safeguard for vulnerable suspects in police custody. Initially, research was largely focused upon the identification of vulnerable suspects Brown, 1989;Brown, Ellis, & Larcombe, 1992;Bucke & Brown, 1997;Gudjonsson, Clare, Rutter, & Pearse, 1993;Irving & McKenzie, 1989;Keyes, Scott, & Truman, 1998;Medford, Gudjonsson, & Pearse, 2000;Pearse, Gudjonsson, Clare, & Rutter, 1998;Phillips & Brown, 1998;Robertson, Pearson, & Gibb, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has consistently shown that many individuals who qualify for this vital safeguard continue to be interviewed without an AA present (Gudjonsson et al, 1993;Irving & McKenzie, 1989;Justice, 1994;Medford et al, 2000;Robertson et al, 1996). Debate now also centres upon the role and contribution of the AA in the policesuspect interview and when an AA is present, their efficacy in safeguarding the rights and interests of vulnerable suspects (Bucke & Brown, 1997;Hodgson, 1997;Pearse & Gudjonsson, 1996a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%