1998
DOI: 10.1051/aas:1998277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pole coordinates and shape of 30 asteroids

Abstract: Abstract. To obtain a statistically reliable sample of minor planets with known rotation axis orientation and axes ratios, a selection of photometric lightcurves sufficiently covered to give the elements needed for applying the computation methods of the rotational elements was made. Using the data reported in the "Amplitude-longitude (A − λ) plot catalogue of asteroids" (Riccioli & Blanco 1995) as a starting point, the amplitude-magnitude (AM ) method (Zappalà et al. 1983a) was adopted. Due to the poor data a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the pole solutions were charged with huge values of formal errors (20 • ) they concluded that the spin and shape parameters could be different. Blanco & Riccioli (1998) used the same observational data and the AM-method, obtained similar results (Table 3).…”
Section: Europasupporting
confidence: 54%
“…As the pole solutions were charged with huge values of formal errors (20 • ) they concluded that the spin and shape parameters could be different. Blanco & Riccioli (1998) used the same observational data and the AM-method, obtained similar results (Table 3).…”
Section: Europasupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The latter paper determined the period to be 9.763 h. Stephens (2005) gives a period of 15.98 h based on new data gathered in 2004, but corrects the value to 9.760 h in 2007 (Stephens 2007), thus confirming the period derived by Zappala et al Blanco & Riccioli (1998) made a preliminary pole determination using the amplitude-magnitude method (see Table 3), which was not confirmed by our results.…”
Section: (386) Siegenasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Observations of 165 Loreley with Keck AO system at 2.1 μm with a pixel scale of 9.94 mas (left). The apparent shape and orientation using the pole solution of Blanco and Riccioli (1998) and ellipse shape is displayed. The measured size ratio (a/b = 1.26 ± 0.08) is in agreement with the one provided by the physical ephemeris (a/b = 1.37).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multiple lightcurve observations of the asteroid, Blanco and Riccioli (1998) determined the orientation of its rotational axis and its shape using the amplitude-magnitude method suggested by Zappala (1981). They reported a pole orientation of λ = 159 ± 18 and β = -65 ± 18 in ECB1950 and ellipse ratios a/b = 1.19 and b/c = 1.27.…”
Section: Other Asteroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%