2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.085202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polaronic hole localization and multiple hole binding of acceptors in oxide wide-gap semiconductors

Abstract: Acceptor-bound holes in oxides often localize asymmetrically at one out of several equivalent oxygen ligands. Whereas Hartree-Fock (HF) theory overly favors such symmetry-broken polaronic holelocalization in oxides, standard local density (LD) calculations suffer from spurious delocalization among several oxygen sites. These opposite biases originate from the opposite curvatures of the energy as a function of the fractional occupation number n, i.e., < 0 in HF and > 0 in LD. We recover the correct linear behav… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

22
387
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
22
387
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further addition of a second extra electron does not cause significant distortion of the system but only a tiny distortion of the bottom of CB in a commonly described perturbed host state (PHS) [32], where the electron is delocalized. The corresponding (0=À1) and (À1=À2) transition energy levels computed with the present computational setup (0.91 and 0.12 eV below the CB bottom, respectively) are consistent with the experimental data and a recent GGA þ U study [18]. While Cu s 2þ is a good acceptor that can easily capture electrons from any shallow donors present in the bulk [(0=À1) charge transition], Cu s þ is a very poor acceptor [(À1=À2) charge transition].…”
Section: Prl 106 066401 (2011) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Esupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further addition of a second extra electron does not cause significant distortion of the system but only a tiny distortion of the bottom of CB in a commonly described perturbed host state (PHS) [32], where the electron is delocalized. The corresponding (0=À1) and (À1=À2) transition energy levels computed with the present computational setup (0.91 and 0.12 eV below the CB bottom, respectively) are consistent with the experimental data and a recent GGA þ U study [18]. While Cu s 2þ is a good acceptor that can easily capture electrons from any shallow donors present in the bulk [(0=À1) charge transition], Cu s þ is a very poor acceptor [(À1=À2) charge transition].…”
Section: Prl 106 066401 (2011) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Esupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The unpaired electron is highly localized on a Cu d z 2 -orbital. The Cu s 2þ species has been previously studied and identified as a deep acceptor [18,30,31]. The addition of an extra electron fills up the Cu 3d shell (Cu s þ ) and induces a considerable outward relaxation of the nearest O atoms (E rel ¼ 0:58 eV), restoring the original zinc tetrahedral coordination.…”
Section: Prl 106 066401 (2011) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 The U value for the oxygen atoms was derived using an ab initio fitting procedure with a Koopman'slike approach. 32,51 This additional term is only applied to bulk CeO 2 calculations and not the clusters. As with the Ti clusters, all Ce-based clusters were simulated in 25 Å Â 25 Å Â 25 Å boxes with a single k-point at G and the structures were held fixed to ensure orbital degeneracies would not be affected by structural variations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density functional theory 3,4 (DFT) remains the most widely used method for this purpose. In spite of recent advances such as the use of hybrid DFT 5 , GW 6 , and a generalized Koopman's method 7 , questions to the quantitative accuracy attainable still remain, and often similar defect calculations can result in different predictions. The challenges broadly arise from two sources: errors inherent to DFT's approximate treatment of electron-electron interactions, and finite size effects from practical limitations to the computational domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%