2015
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarizing T and B Cell Responses by APC-Targeted Subunit Vaccines

Abstract: Current influenza vaccines mostly aim at the induction of specific neutralizing antibodies. While antibodies are important for protection against a particular virus strain, T cells can recognize epitopes that will offer broader protection against influenza. We have previously developed a DNA vaccine format by which protein antigens can be targeted specifically to receptors on antigen presenting cells (APCs). The DNA-encoded vaccine proteins are homodimers, each chain consisting of a targeting unit, a dimerizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
36
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(102 reference statements)
1
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous reports have shown that several of the targeting units used in this study (aMHCII, Xcl1, MIP1-a, aCD40) enhanced T cell responses (8,9,11,13,18,19). Thus, the relatively selective IgG2a responses elicited by Xcl1, MIP-1a, and aCD40 targeting correlated with increased Th1 responses (9,11,18,19), whereas the mixed IgG1/2a responses induced by aMHCII targeting was associated with a mixed Th1/2 profile (18,24). Thus, for the novel specificities, it is likely that GM-CSF induces predominantly a Th2 response, aDEC205 a Th1 response, whereas aCD11c, FliC, and Flt-3L elicit a mixed Th1/2 response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…However, previous reports have shown that several of the targeting units used in this study (aMHCII, Xcl1, MIP1-a, aCD40) enhanced T cell responses (8,9,11,13,18,19). Thus, the relatively selective IgG2a responses elicited by Xcl1, MIP-1a, and aCD40 targeting correlated with increased Th1 responses (9,11,18,19), whereas the mixed IgG1/2a responses induced by aMHCII targeting was associated with a mixed Th1/2 profile (18,24). Thus, for the novel specificities, it is likely that GM-CSF induces predominantly a Th2 response, aDEC205 a Th1 response, whereas aCD11c, FliC, and Flt-3L elicit a mixed Th1/2 response.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…routes induced both IgG1 and IgG2a JEV‐specific antibody responses, IgG2a titers being 1.5‐fold higher than IgG1 titers (Fig. ), indicating good induction of a Th1 cell response . By contrast, MVA‐vJH6 immunization s.l.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…generated titers of IgG1 that were approximately twice those of IgG2a, indicating that the Th2 cell response was stronger (Fig. ) . However, both vaccine types administered via s.l.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The UV-inactivated SARS coronavirus vaccine retained its immunogenicity and promoted Th2type immune responses (Tsunetsugu-Yokota et al 2007). The activation of Th2 responses such as IL-10 stimulate B cell proliferation, which can produce specific and nonspecific anti-infection antibodies (Grodeland et al 2015); similarly, both T and B cells have functions following Lactobacillus vaccination. The production of IL-9 by Th2 cells results in the proliferation of mast cell growth, and IL-13 stimulates epithelial cell growth (Tukler Henriksson et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%